Motability Cars

[SPLINE]

Apparently there was a website called 'Motability Checker', on which you could type a car's number in to see if it is on the scheme.

The site was run by a Max Tempers, who is described as 'far-right' of course, and he went around posting photos of abuses of Motability cars.

The site got taken down by the govt this week. Coincidentally Rachel Thieves announced changes to the Motability scheme this week.

 

[morqthana]

he went around posting photos of abuses of Motability cars.

And he knew they were abuses how, exactly?

 

[SPLINE]

And he knew they were abuses how, exactly?

How much do we pay to muslims in "benefits" Himmy?

 

[morqthana]

How much do we pay to muslims in "benefits" Himmy?

1) I'm not "Himmy". You know that, but you are the sort of person who doesn't care if he says things which he knows to be untrue.

2) Even if that were a question which could be answered, what would it it have to do with Motability? Have you ever considered behaving rationally?

3) Nobody knows, as the religious beliefs of benefit claimants are not recorded.

 

[fillyboy]

I'm not "Himmy".

Yes you are.

 

[morqthana]

Yes you are.

You really are on a roll tonight with posting falsehoods.

Is it trolling, or do you have some kind of problem?

 

[fillyboy]

You really are on a roll tonight with posting falsehoods.

Is it trolling, or do you have some kind of problem?

I think you're the one with the problem. Select one identity and stick with it.

 

[morqthana]

I only have the one.

I wonder how much of your actual life you base on completely invented falsehoods, and how much of a handicap pathological mendacity is for you.

Or is it only here where you just write untruth after untruth after untruth?

 

[fillyboy]

I only have the one.

I wonder how much of your actual life you base on completely invented falsehoods, and how much of a handicap pathological mendacity is for you.

Or is it only here where you just write untruth after untruth after untruth?

You really are a very sick person.

 

[morqthana]

And you are, once again, totally lacking any ability to argue your position with logic and honesty.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

You really are on a roll tonight with posting falsehoods.

Is it trolling, or do you have some kind of problem?

It's a bit of both

 

[morqthana]

Let's try to dial this back.

Spline posted about someone "posting photos of abuses of Motability cars", and I asked him how that person knew they were abuses.

And his reply to that was

How much do we pay to muslims in "benefits" Himmy?

So where's the logic in that? Where's the reasoning? There is zero relevance of that to the question I asked, so why on earth post it?

And when I challenged him over the "Himmy" nonsense, fillyboy, and by proxy pete01, Highway Man, and aveatry piled on.

WHY?

Firstly it's an allegation for which you all know there is not a shred of proof, it's just fevered imaginings from you, and secondly where's the logic in it? Where's the reasoning? What is the relevance of it to the topic under discussion?

Why do you people, over and over again, launch into nonsense, false claims, insults and abuse instead of arguing for your point of view in ways which show you've thought about it, that you're using logic and reasoning, that you are recognising the existence of facts and evidence?

Why do you think that your behaviour is a valid substitute for those?

 

[carmanmemoranda]

Let's try to dial this back.

Spline posted about someone "posting photos of abuses of Motability cars", and I asked him how that person knew they were abuses.

And his reply to that was



So where's the logic in that? Where's the reasoning? There is zero relevance of that to the question I asked, so why on earth post it?

And when I challenged him over the "Himmy" nonsense, fillyboy, and by proxy pete01, Highway Man, and aveatry piled on.

WHY?

Firstly it's an allegation for which you all know there is not a shred of proof, it's just fevered imaginings from you, and secondly where's the logic in it? Where's the reasoning? What is the relevance of it to the topic under discussion?

Why do you people, over and over again, launch into nonsense, false claims, insults and abuse instead of arguing for your point of view in ways which show you've thought about it, that you're using logic and reasoning, that you are recognising the existence of facts and evidence?

Why do you think that your behaviour is a valid substitute for those?

The pile ons happen repeatedly.

No reasoning needed

 

[morqthana]

The pile ons happen repeatedly.

No reasoning needed

And yet when one other person (you) started saying similar things to me in the fire-fighter thread, pete01's reaction was

Oh here he is

Let's get on the bandwagon

 

[carmanmemoranda]

And yet when one other person (you) started saying similar things to me in the fire-fighter thread, pete01's reaction was

Anybody who is not far right, is fair game for a pile on.