National Grooming Gangs Inquiry Announced

[Knave of Hearts]

So you admit you are the not mighty Himmy—

It's been obvious (well to normal aware people, so it might not include you), for the last several days that fillystine and others have been addressing me with a multiple of addresses and responded to my post.

 

[pete01]

It's been obvious (well to normal aware people, so it might not include you), for the last several days that fillystine has been addressing me with a multiple of addresses.

Busted

 

[pete01]

That proves that pete is deceitful scammer

I think someone loves pete......ahhhh bless ya

 

[pete01]

Suits you sir......night night.....

 

[Knave of Hearts]

Busted

Hardly, you, fillstine, leftus and others have been addressing me with a number of addresses. All of such posts with those multiple of addresses have all been responding to my posts.

 

[Knave of Hearts]

Suits you sir......night night.....

View attachment 396812

I did explain before you rejoined that I chose that username due to Lewis Carroll's story Alice in Wonderland, and a specific event.
It was a satirical example of the typical idiotic thinking on here:

"Sentence first, verdict afterwards" is a phrase from {Lewis Carroll's https://wordhistories.net/2019/07/14/sentence-first-verdict-afterwards/} Alice's Adventures in Wonderland, used to describe a situation with a pre-determined or unjust outcome. In the book, the Queen of Hearts insists on this order during the trial of the Knave of Hearts, a demand that serves as a satirical critique of unchecked power and the absence of a fair legal process.

 

[pete01]

I haven't read that it looks boring....

Seriously now I wont be doing this again im bored of it.....

Apologies to everyone, I know it's boring and its ruined this thread a bit it wont happen again....

 

[Knave of Hearts]

I think someone loves pete......ahhhh bless ya

Scammers are the scourge of society.

 

[Knave of Hearts]

I haven't read that it looks boring....

Seriously now I wont be doing this again im bored of it.....

Apologies to everyone I know it's boring and its ruined this thread a bit it wont happoen again....

Oh, it will, you and others will make sure of it.
it's the normal pattern of behaviour on here. It's why several previous posters have left due to the toxic atmosphere on here. Tom told me.
And it'll spoil loads more threads yet.

 

[fillyboy]

And it'll spoil loads mor threads yet.

And you'll delight in it, as you always do.

 

[Knave of Hearts]

And you'll delight in it, as you always do.

I'm merely bating away unfair, unwarranted and untrue allegations from the usual suspects.
if you insist on making such unwarranted false allegations I'll continue to bat them away.
And you're still at it.

 

[morqthana]

In the meantime, while everybody is arguing about whether a deleted member reneged on a bet, johnny2007 is sitting here having reneged on a commitment he made:

I tell you again:
So far, your beloved child rapist gang members have been found to be Asian/Pakistani.
White rapists exist, but so far they have been found to be lone wolves, not organised in gangs.

That's the difference!

The gang members have a logistic plan in place to systematically groom and rape children. They believe it is ok to do this.

The others are dirty bast@rds who act on their animals instinct. They know they're criminals and they don't discuss their crimes with anyone, that's why they're not in gangs

If the enquiry finds white rapists gangs I'll withdraw this statement, but in the meantime this is the pure truth.

And I gave him an example of a white rapist gang, and he said this:

Yes, they caught 3 white dirty b@stards recently.
Hardly comparable with historical gangs operating systematically since the 90s and involving more than 3 criminals.

So that was your "justification" for not withdrawing your statement, was it johnny?

"they caught 3 white dirty b@stards recently.
Hardly comparable with historical gangs operating systematically since the 90s and involving more than 3 criminals."

It was TEN men, johnny, not 3. Is 10 not a big enough number to qualify as a "gang"?

They had a house specifically to use for raping girls between 13 and 15 years old. Is that not "systematic" enough for you, johnny?

They did this between 2016 and 2018. Is that not long enough for you, johnny?


Care to present a good reason for not withdrawing your statement?

10 men. Girls of 13-15. A house kept as a rape venue. 2-3 years. Do you still think it's OK to say that anybody who talks about things like this are supporting or seeking to excuse the Asian child rapists, johnny?

Tell us johnny, how comfortable would you be sitting down with the victims of that Bolton gang and telling them that their experiences were

Hardly comparable

with those of other girls because their abusers were fewer in number, and operated for a shorter time?

And are you now going to

a) Ignore this?
b) Deal properly with the issues it raises?
c) Resort to more abuse?

 

[noseall]

In the meantime, while everybody is arguing about whether a deleted member reneged on a bet, johnny2007 is sitting here having reneged on a commitment he made:



And I gave him an example of a white rapist gang, and he said this:



So that was your "justification" for not withdrawing your statement, was it johnny?

"they caught 3 white dirty b@stards recently.
Hardly comparable with historical gangs operating systematically since the 90s and involving more than 3 criminals."

It was TEN men, johnny, not 3. Is 10 not a big enough number to qualify as a "gang"?

They had a house specifically to use for raping girls between 13 and 15 years old. Is that not "systematic" enough for you, johnny?

They did this between 2016 and 2018. Is that not long enough for you, johnny?


Care to present a good reason for not withdrawing your statement?

10 men. Girls of 13-15. A house kept as a rape venue. 2-3 years. Do you still think it's OK to say that anybody who talks about things like this are supporting or seeking to excuse the Asian child rapists, johnny?

Tell us johnny, how comfortable would you be sitting down with the victims of that Bolton gang and telling them that their experiences were

with those of other girls because their abusers were fewer in number, and operated for a shorter time?

And are you now going to

a) Ignore this?
b) Deal properly with the issues it raises?
c) Resort to more abuse?

You will often see Muslim haters trying to sweep the prolific (and majority UK) white boy paedo abuser problem, under the carpet. In favour of their narrowly focused hatred.

 

[Odds]

Abuse victims who were not groomed by gangs have argued that the new inquiry should include their experiences too. Katie (not her real name), a survivor from Lincolnshire whose testimony helped to jail one of dozens of her abusers for rape, said she was concerned that those pushing a narrow ‘Asian grooming gang’ narrative were gatekeeping the inquiries before they had begun.

“The constant use of the term ‘grooming gangs’ is misleading and confusing. It is not an official safeguarding term, yet it continues to be used by government and media. Baroness Casey was clear: this was always supposed to be an inquiry into group-based child sexual exploitation (CSE). It was not a ‘grooming gangs’ inquiry,” she said.

Analysis @ the Guardian

I heard on Sky news the split was 5-4 in favour of keeping Jess Phillips in the role, so the split among survivors, although close, should determine the enquiry goes ahead as they see fit.

 

[noseall]

Abuse victims who were not groomed by gangs have argued that the new inquiry should include their experiences too

Yes. It's wrong to ignore the fact that a majority of gang based child sexual abuse is white British male and wrong to ignore the victims of that abuse.