• Looking for a smarter way to manage your heating this winter? We’ve been testing the new Aqara Radiator Thermostat W600 to see how quiet, accurate and easy it is to use around the home. Click here read our review.

New EU digital border checks

Sponsored Links
Highway Man said:
Police databases are constantly in need of good fingerprints and DNA samples
Click to expand...
I’m sure they would love to capture the entire population, but a database is not there waiting for a crime to happen
 
Makes me laugh when the likes of Lally fiercely defend their rights for anonymity and are against showing perfectly acceptable ID to vote or to enter or leave the country but will happily hand over any type of ID when they go to their local recycling centre, collect a parcel or letter from the post office or take out a library book.
 
Mottie said:
Makes me laugh when the likes of Lally fiercely defend their rights for anonymity and are against showing perfectly acceptable ID to vote or to enter or leave the country but will happily hand over any type of ID when they go to their local recycling centre, collect a parcel or letter from the post office or take out a library book.
Click to expand...
It isn't showing ID to leave the country or enter a foreign country, it's giving your data to a foreign country, which they can hold in perpetuity.
Highway Man is content to offer his fingerprints etc to a UK based organisation. The EES means giving that data to all the foreign countries in the Schengen Zone.
 
Murdochcat said:
I wonder if the RNLI will be capturing all this data for the unofficial arrivals in the UK
Click to expand...
The UK already captures fingerprints and DNA of asylum seekers. :rolleyes:

Why don't people check the premise of their assumptions before making fools of themselves? :rolleyes:
 
Highway Man said:
Nope, I wasn't drunk and dissordely, I have a record for it which like the conviction was wrong, I assume we are talking about the time I was sat in a bus shelter when I got home on leave?
Click to expand...
I don't know of the incident.
But in one minute you said you were found guilty of D and D, then in the next breath you say you weren't guilty.
Did they not breathalise you, or do a blood test to determine your innocence?
If they didn't why didn't you get one done to prove your innocence?

It would have been such an easy defence. :rolleyes:

Was this before you got your degree or afterwards? :rolleyes:
 
Knave of Hearts said:
I don't know of the incident.
But in one minute you said you were found guilty of D and D, then in the next breath you say you weren't guilty.
Did they not breathalise you, or do a blood test to determine your innocence?
If they didn't why didn't you get one done to prove your innocence?

It would have been such an easy defence. :rolleyes:

Was this before you got your degree or afterwards? :rolleyes:
Click to expand...
Very difficult for a fool like you to understand. I was found guilty but I wasn't guilty, same as my assault charges, I wasn't found guilty of those yet I was fighting in the pub, explain that then einstrein
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Sponsored Links

Similar threads

JBR
  • Locked
UKIP - a 'one trick pony'?
11 12 13
Replies
188
Views
27K
RNReindeer
R
Back
Top