Bernards post #19 shows a strange change of direction in tne period before it hit the tanker.Indeed, they may well have had a hand in the Nordstream sabotage.
Bernards post #19 shows a strange change of direction in tne period before it hit the tanker.Indeed, they may well have had a hand in the Nordstream sabotage.
I thought that was a ukranian caper?Indeed, they may well have had a hand in the Nordstream sabotage.
I thought that was a ukranian caper?
I thought that was a ukranian caper?
but we've yet to hear the zellenski conspiracy theory.
No, that was the track after collision - compare it to @motorbikings post #34...Bernards post #19 shows a strange change of direction in tne period before it hit the tanker.

Not really, as above, the first change of direction is where the collision took place.Bernards post #19 shows a strange change of direction in tne period before it hit the tanker.

Like most conspiracy theories, there would be better ways of doing it, if it was intended.From what I can see, there really isn't any need to incite conspiracy theories (at least not yet!).
Surely modern ships have sysems in place to set and maintain paths automatically? And the ship struck was not moving, so no adjustments required.
For some reason, this put me in mind of the (supposedly true, and definitely funny) stuff that some people put on their insurance claims.
"The guy was all over the road. I had to swerve a number of times before I hit him."
![]()
It will make for an interesting chat between Trump and Putin during the Ukrainian peace talks.

A factor? What do you mean? did it cause them to go off course and hit an anchored ship? That would be beyond incompetence.So, the tide was a factor in the accident or not?

Not when you overlay the original location of the immaculate. Bernard's post shows a move of 0.3NM. 500M. it's highly possible that the anchor dragged that much.Bernards post #19 shows a strange change of direction in tne period before it hit the tanker.