Oil tanker v Cargo ship.

Bernards post #19 shows a strange change of direction in tne period before it hit the tanker.
No, that was the track after collision - compare it to @motorbikings post #34...

1741779181049.jpeg


Screenshot_20250312_112946_Chrome.jpg
 
From what I can see, there really isn't any need to incite conspiracy theories (at least not yet!).
Albeit based on some older reports, about 45% of marine casualties involved collision and of those...

Screenshot_20250312_112648_Chrome.jpg


Reading through MAIB reports can be fascinating if you're interested in human factors engineering. Poor bridge management, use of technology and watch keeping is common in these incidents.

Besides, antagonising the US would probably be the last thing that Putin would want at this point.
 
Surely modern ships have sysems in place to set and maintain paths automatically? And the ship struck was not moving, so no adjustments required.

For some reason, this put me in mind of the (supposedly true, and definitely funny) stuff that some people put on their insurance claims.

"The guy was all over the road. I had to swerve a number of times before I hit him."

:ROFLMAO:
 
Captain of the Solong is a Russian national. Conspiracy theorists are going to have a field day.
 
A Russian sea captain rams an American tanker loaded with US Air Force jet fuel.
It will make for an interesting chat between Trump and Putin during the Ukrainian peace talks.
 
So, the tide was a factor in the accident or not?
A factor? What do you mean? did it cause them to go off course and hit an anchored ship? That would be beyond incompetence.
 
Bernards post #19 shows a strange change of direction in tne period before it hit the tanker.
Not when you overlay the original location of the immaculate. Bernard's post shows a move of 0.3NM. 500M. it's highly possible that the anchor dragged that much.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top