OMG Human Rights Lawyers Again

So, does this mean that this man is no longer claiming to be an asylum seeker.

Instead he is claiming to be a victim of human trafficking.

Or is he claiming both.
 
I'm not interested in running 100 pages telling you something only for you to pretend you are more knowledgeable.

But giving you the benefit of the doubt.

The home office lawyers screwed up, they invited the possibility that he could make further submissions to prove his claim, but that he would be unable to do this from France. They opened the door for his lawyers. They were slightly hindered by this ruling https://cloud-platform-a3746548e43b85309785c70a0876e95c.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/decision/pdf_file/80195/00067_ukut_iac_2024_vlt_vietnam_ijr.pdf?AWSAccessKeyId=AKIA27HJSWAHNYGRJ42F&Signature=XmlPNNBBNq7ucOYsdcy95a/Hm0k=&Expires=1758097928

as you will see Human Rights is the main argument.
 
Here is a Google AI as a starting point for anyone who is interested in what all this is about. It looks like it all stems from a 2008 Treaty on Human Trafficking. On the face of it, nothing to do with ECHR. But I am happy to be proved wrong. It is not something I have dealt with previously.

AI Overview

The UK's National Referral Mechanism (NRM) provides medical help and accommodation for potential human trafficking survivors through a 45-day reflection and recovery period, with support from designated agencies like police, local authorities, and charities such as the Salvation Army, who provide safe housing, financial aid, and medical assistance. If a "reasonable grounds" decision is made, support begins, and a conclusive decision is later reached by the Single Competent Authority (SCA) or Immigration Enforcement Competent Authority (IECA).
 
And it looks like the judge in this case has simply decided that the government didn't make a proper assessment of this man's human trafficking claim. So, the judge has temporarily paused the deportation to France and has asked the government to make a proper assessment before he makes his final decision.

This is a lot to get my head round!!
 
MNW67 said:
If you know how this all fits together legally, just explain it for us.

Instead of being a prick.
Click to expand...
Here we go, 100’s of pages. That’s what we need another ****ing contest.

The GD is clogged up with petty posts and arguments.

Maybe Diynot should have a politics section and I’d happily have no access to it.
 
MNW67 said:
And it looks like the judge in this case has simply decided that the government didn't make a proper assessment of this man's human trafficking claim. So, the judge has temporarily paused the deportation to France and has asked the government to make a proper assessment before he makes his final decision.

This is a lot to get my head round!!
Click to expand...
Actually the other way around. It's been paused so that he can better present his claim. see post 12
 
But the claims under ECHR failed.

It was only the human trafficking claim that has caused the deportation to be paused.

This is all very interesting!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

L
Why we need better border controls.
2
Replies
21
Views
3K
Infidel
I
pred
United Kingdom
3 4 5
Replies
73
Views
10K
mark vincent
M
JohnD
  • Locked
Brexit residency rights
2 3
Replies
44
Views
7K
blightymam
B
T
Is this site really evil?
Replies
12
Views
2K
tim west
T
Deluks
No mention of the bomber?
2
Replies
22
Views
3K
ColJack
ColJack
Back
Top