Following the shooting dead of the Brazillian electrician, as widely predicted the officer who shot the Forest Gate house owner has got off as well !
The Met Police have wheeled out their asian Ass. Commissioner to make the media statement saying:-
"""In this case an independent forensic scientist has concluded that the weapon was within two inches of Abdulkahar when discharged and was not in a normal firing position. The IPCC has concluded there was no evidence that it was a deliberate act by the officer, or indeed no evidence of intent or recklessness. The report states that the officer has committed no criminal or disciplinary offences."""
One could conclude that as long as an officer puts his gun up against you then he is free to shoot you without taking any responsibility.
The other amazing evidence is that "the officer was not aware the gun had discharged".
Anyone who has fired a gun knows that there is very considerable recoil that can even dislocate your wrist so its impossible for me to accept that statement as anything other than an intentional lie.
Anybody trained in gun usage knows that you are on heightened alert whenever the safety catch is off.
""the officer has committed no criminal or disciplinary offences"". So yet again the Police can shoot someone without commiting any offence!
Does that finding give anyone any confidence in the Police Complaints Commission ( which is mostly staffed by police on secondment ! )
The Met Police have wheeled out their asian Ass. Commissioner to make the media statement saying:-
"""In this case an independent forensic scientist has concluded that the weapon was within two inches of Abdulkahar when discharged and was not in a normal firing position. The IPCC has concluded there was no evidence that it was a deliberate act by the officer, or indeed no evidence of intent or recklessness. The report states that the officer has committed no criminal or disciplinary offences."""
One could conclude that as long as an officer puts his gun up against you then he is free to shoot you without taking any responsibility.
The other amazing evidence is that "the officer was not aware the gun had discharged".
Anyone who has fired a gun knows that there is very considerable recoil that can even dislocate your wrist so its impossible for me to accept that statement as anything other than an intentional lie.
Anybody trained in gun usage knows that you are on heightened alert whenever the safety catch is off.
""the officer has committed no criminal or disciplinary offences"". So yet again the Police can shoot someone without commiting any offence!
Does that finding give anyone any confidence in the Police Complaints Commission ( which is mostly staffed by police on secondment ! )