D
dextrous
I don't hate her. Due to ineptness caused in part by her management methods (failure to sufficiently monitor and appraise and adapt), a child died. It was her call - she goes.
Poor Sharon Shoesmith????? Not.
- Thread starter roughcaster
- Start date
Sponsored Links
Dex, I was talking more to the "this useless arrogant **** still hasnt had the karma she deserves" "Leech" people.
I fully support accountability in public office...but it is the hatred, from some members, I am struggling with.
I fully support accountability in public office...but it is the hatred, from some members, I am struggling with.
D
dextrous
If it can be demonstrated that the departments that were involved in caring for them were badly run and managed, which contributed to the failure of sufficient protection being in place, then yes.
We're all well aware that you can't cotton-wrap every child. However, if there are significant failings within a system and the manager of that department is unaware of these failings and has not made provisions to resolve them, then they are responsible.
Sponsored Links
H
herebriefly
Thanks joe. Didnt think you would converse with me.... a lowly council tenant
Makes for interesting reading joe and exasburates (which Im shure iz speltt wrogly) what is wrong with the society we live in.
David.
D
dextrous
We've had emotive "discussions" before - these are always likely to sail close to the wind.
In this instance, the fact that Shoesmith herself was appealing against her dismissal does seem to suggest serious character flaws on her part. She has put herself on a pedestal to be pilloried. We all come across people like this - they seem to eventually think they are "untouchable". Pity really.
- Joined
- 28 Oct 2005
- Messages
- 31,281
- Reaction score
- 1,997
- Country
Thanks joe. Didnt think you would converse with me.... a lowly council tenant
Makes for interesting reading joe and exasburates (which Im shure iz speltt wrogly) what is wrong with the society we live in.
David.
I'll make an exception.
She gets the sack - and becomes a millionaire. Great isn't it?
D
dextrous
What wrath is that then?
H
herebriefly
Personally, Id like to 'take out' a few parents where I live. I whole-heartidly agree with joe here.
So...... you obtain a position of power with a wage matching your responsibility. You then fook up... let kids die.
Then sue for in excess of a million quid?
Fuuucked up to say the least.
David.
So...... you obtain a position of power with a wage matching your responsibility. You then fook up... let kids die.
Then sue for in excess of a million quid?
Fuuucked up to say the least.
David.
L
lifesagasman
not everyone hates her but she carries the responsibility so her neck should be on the block
I hate all the fooked up, over paid, lazy, good for nothing birstards.
Every child matters? Really!
Every child matters? Really!
D
dextrous
Oops, I'm off then
- Joined
- 28 Oct 2005
- Messages
- 31,281
- Reaction score
- 1,997
- Country
OK well who carries the can for this lot then? Sack them all? Someone must be in charge eh?
"Almost four children a week died or suffered a serious injury at home last year through neglect or abuse despite tougher child protection rules after the death of Baby P. "
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article7010408.ece
"Almost four children a week died or suffered a serious injury at home last year through neglect or abuse despite tougher child protection rules after the death of Baby P. "
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/crime/article7010408.ece
H
herebriefly
Whilst I can accept your point, I cannot agree with it. You seem devoid of emotion in my view. You seen 'aloof' of emotion and I struggle with that, especially when a small child had literally been beaten to death by the people who he looked at with them big blue eyes.
May I ask if you have a child (or children)?
David.
Sponsored Links
