Yes. Actually re-reading both the judgment and the amended GPDO (again - and for the umpteenth time), I'm minded to reverse my opinion. In fact, as long as the proposed extension adjoins the existing then it cannot be permitted development - because, taken as a whole, the extension is not pd
Prior Approval
- Thread starter Nakajo
- Start date
Sponsored Links
Just to add my 2-cents' worth: that would not be PD for several reasons, chief being that the Hilton loophole has now been well and truly closed.
Also, the two-storey part is higher than 4m - there are probably other reasons as well, but it's Friday night and I couldn't be bothered to check
Also, the two-storey part is higher than 4m - there are probably other reasons as well, but it's Friday night and I couldn't be bothered to check
Sponsored Links
DIYnot Local
Staff member
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local
Similar threads
