- Joined
- 7 Mar 2014
- Messages
- 144
- Reaction score
- 7
- Country
We have a flat with Pulsacoil III used as a hot water source. There is no gas in the property, only electricity. Pulsacoil is about 15 years old, from new built.
Tenant new tenant moved in and reported there was no hot water, plumbers called in by the agency and advised that that the pump to be seized and need to be replaced, but as any repair for these old cylinders there could be further faults and if so then will repair uneconomical, suggesting to replace the cylinder rather than repair it.
They offered following options for replacement:
Option 1: To replace the pump on old cylinder.
Option 2: To replace the cylinder with a center brand cylinder. (20 year cylinder leak warranty and 2 year parts warranty)
Option 3: To replace the cylinder with a Tempest cylinder. (20 year cylinder leak warranty and 2 year parts warranty)
Option 4: To replace the cylinder with a Megaflow cylinder. (25 year cylinder leak warranty and 2 year parts warranty)
I'd like to know if indeed replacing pump on a 15 year old Pulsacoil may be false economy and indeed better to replace the whole thing completely?
If indeed better to replace - I would appreciate expect opinion / advice on reliability of other options offered (less maintenance - better as this property is being rented out at the moment).
Also what concerns me is that as far as I know Pulsacoil is not a water Cylinder, rather a thermal store and due to the initial design of the flat and installation there is no drain or relief pipework where Pulsacoil is installed.
Does it make any sense to replace it with water cylinder or there may be other options?
I would probably avoid megaflow option as it is most expensive.
Thanks for advice.
Tenant new tenant moved in and reported there was no hot water, plumbers called in by the agency and advised that that the pump to be seized and need to be replaced, but as any repair for these old cylinders there could be further faults and if so then will repair uneconomical, suggesting to replace the cylinder rather than repair it.
They offered following options for replacement:
Option 1: To replace the pump on old cylinder.
Option 2: To replace the cylinder with a center brand cylinder. (20 year cylinder leak warranty and 2 year parts warranty)
Option 3: To replace the cylinder with a Tempest cylinder. (20 year cylinder leak warranty and 2 year parts warranty)
Option 4: To replace the cylinder with a Megaflow cylinder. (25 year cylinder leak warranty and 2 year parts warranty)
I'd like to know if indeed replacing pump on a 15 year old Pulsacoil may be false economy and indeed better to replace the whole thing completely?
If indeed better to replace - I would appreciate expect opinion / advice on reliability of other options offered (less maintenance - better as this property is being rented out at the moment).
Also what concerns me is that as far as I know Pulsacoil is not a water Cylinder, rather a thermal store and due to the initial design of the flat and installation there is no drain or relief pipework where Pulsacoil is installed.
Does it make any sense to replace it with water cylinder or there may be other options?
I would probably avoid megaflow option as it is most expensive.
Thanks for advice.
Last edited: