- Joined
- 7 Nov 2023
- Messages
- 22,588
- Reaction score
- 14,650
- Country

The navy are here to protect our borders and seas. So protect them and do not allow these invaders in inflatables into our waters. End of.


That the current approach isn't working doesn't mean that any other random approach would work better. Many, including the Reform version, would make things worse.The current approach isn’t working, the numbers are back to the last full year of conservative government and the budget has gone through the roof.
The destination and crossing method has to be made unattractive. There would be plenty of scenarios where a patrol vessel could safely intercept a boat and turn it back.
You always have to take it to the most made up extremes dont you.This is the real world. Are you saying that you'd want the Navy to sit and watch people drown, even actively pushing them off their boats and preventing the RNLI from rescuing them.
Just because you ignore reality doesn't mean it won't happen. And if you're making a plan for this you have to consider what will happen if someone doesn't mindlessly follow your script.

Why do you think this is a random approach? It seems to have worked in countries that have tried it.That the current approach isn't working doesn't mean that any other random approach would work better. Many, including the Reform version, would make things worse.
Its also possible that we have the best possible approach in place already. After all fifty different PMs gave tried to address this over the last decade and none have had any better ideas. Some things cannot be 'fixed'.
Has it worked? Because I don't think there are any other good examples of this working, especially when the only other nation involved has explicitly said they won't cooperate.Why do you think this is a random approach? It seems to have worked in countries that have tried it.
At the moment the boats are getting bigger and the costs are rising.
Which is violating their (the French) sovereignty and is technically renditioning people on suspicion that they're going to commit a civil offense in a different country to the one they're in.Farages plan is to use the navy to RESCUE them all in french waters (because the french aren’t doing it ) and then take them back to france where they came from.
If so - I dont care.Which is violating their sovereignty and is technically renditioning people on suspicion that they're going to commit a civil offense in a different country to the one they're in.
It's the plan of an idiot. If we wanted to do this we could just second a load of boats to the French Gendarmes and let them operate under their control, or more efficiently just fund the French to do it, which we already do.
Your plan is actually more or less how we process people, just with a hint of extra vindictive cruelty.
And no, being mean, aka the hostile environment, was tried and failed to make any difference.
Which is why you shouldn't be allowed to be in charge of foreign affairs. You and Farage and the entirety of the Reform party.If so - I dont care


Greece, Hungary, Denmark, Poland, Japan, Australia and now Ireland have all adopted "hostile" policies with success.Has it worked? Because I don't think there are any other good examples of this working, especially when the only other nation involved has explicitly said they won't cooperate.
They've adopted a huge range of vastly different policies and some have been massive failures. Australias policy was running to more than a million dollars per refugee last I heard.Greece, Hungary, Denmark, Poland, Japan, Australia and now Ireland have all adopted "hostile" policies with success.

I think it needs tweaking, like their last plan. it is entirely possible to:... Reform car crash plan. ... different doesn't mean we have to use this particularly thick Reform plan.