I'm prepared to be slagged off but I'm pretty sure if your pipe doesn't go to earth and you add an 'escape route' to it, if you have a fault, that pipework will become, potentially, live.
Plastic Water Supply Pipe
IR Test between the copper (tap/pipe) if it is there and the MET.
If it's more than 22KΩ don't bond, and if it's less than 22 KΩ it needs bonding.
Plastic Water Supply Pipe
IR Test between the copper (tap/pipe) if it is there and the MET.
If it's more than 22KΩ don't bond, and if it's less than 22 KΩ it needs bonding.
I only meant that as it's easier to understand what it does in equalising potential difference.
In order to establish if the water service were not now an extraneous conductive part it would be necessary to disconnect it from all of the above mentioned parts to test.
I assume 544.1.2 states what it does is because the disconnection for testing is not going to be done and the regulations still consider that the pipe may be liable to introduce a potential because it is still connected to all of the above mentioned parts.
If anyone else thinks differently perhaps they will say. i'm sure they will.
But if RCD protected? (still a lot to get in me nut!!)
I know it most certainly isn't but without going to in-depth discussions with the op about why MPB is carried out and why it may not need doing I advised him to do what 99% of electricians would do who don't have an ounce of engineering judgement.
I would personally enjoy a debate with an NIC inspector who had said that bonding to the main water is required regardless of the material make-up of the incoming pipe.
No doubt someone will be along in a minute to mention about the conducting properties of water with TDS in it !
In order to establish if the water service were not now an extraneous conductive part it would be necessary to disconnect it from all of the above mentioned parts to test.
Indeed you would, for it cannot be an e-c-p if you've connected it to the electrical installation.
I assume 544.1.2 states what it does is because the disconnection for testing is not going to be done and the regulations still consider that the pipe may be liable to introduce a potential because it is still connected to all of the above mentioned parts.
How can it be considered to be introducing a potential when what you've done is to connect it to the electrical installation which by definition it must not be part of for it to be an e-c-p?
Then you know it almost certainly does not require bonding.
but without going to in-depth discussions with the op about why MPB is carried out and why it may not need doing I advised him to do what 99% of electricians would do who don't have an ounce of engineering judgement.
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below,
or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Please select a service and enter a location to continue...
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local