Whilst I understand the argument and rationale behind not locking people up for longer as it doesn't equate to a reduction in crime, where does that leave us in terms of achieving justice for victims of crime? Although there will be numerous cases where the sentence given is adequate, equally there are other cases where this doesn't appear to be the case.
For example, I read something a few weeks back re: guy heavily attacked in a completely unprovoked manner by two guys. He was left with life changing injuries (think about that for a sec, 'life changing') and they received sentences that could see them walking the streets in just a few years.
Woman conned OAP out of £90k, given just over 2 years in prison and ordered to pay back ... wait for it ... £1. The laughable thing was the police saying 'this sentence will demonstrate to people that crimes of this type will not be tolerated.' Eh? She'll probably be out in 18 months.
And why, when the crime evidently merits it, is the legal system so reluctant to give a true life sentence? I will be interested to see how long those recently found guilty of causing the deaths of 39 migrants are sentenced for. Even that tragic case a while back about the little boy being intentionally crushed behind his dad/step-dad's driver seat. I think he got just over 7 years.
What are your views? Do you think broadly the sentences are proportional or that we need a rethink on sentencing?
For example, I read something a few weeks back re: guy heavily attacked in a completely unprovoked manner by two guys. He was left with life changing injuries (think about that for a sec, 'life changing') and they received sentences that could see them walking the streets in just a few years.
Woman conned OAP out of £90k, given just over 2 years in prison and ordered to pay back ... wait for it ... £1. The laughable thing was the police saying 'this sentence will demonstrate to people that crimes of this type will not be tolerated.' Eh? She'll probably be out in 18 months.
And why, when the crime evidently merits it, is the legal system so reluctant to give a true life sentence? I will be interested to see how long those recently found guilty of causing the deaths of 39 migrants are sentenced for. Even that tragic case a while back about the little boy being intentionally crushed behind his dad/step-dad's driver seat. I think he got just over 7 years.
What are your views? Do you think broadly the sentences are proportional or that we need a rethink on sentencing?