As I said, what I inherited was a 'variant'. It certainly did not involve a borrowed neutral, which I imagine is probably why it was done.That would be the modern (conversion) method and surely not involve a borrowed neutral, wouldn't it? ... Edit - or rather a miswired conversion method.Although it basically used the 'old' method of 2-way switch wiring, it used 3C+E cable, with the L feed travelling in the third core, with the two strappers. ... so there are variations around.
It was not quite the 'modern method', since, with that, the third core (the other two being the strappers joining the two L1s and the two L2s) would be joining the two COMs. With mine, it was simply a permanent live feed to the COM of switch remote from the light - hence representing a 'correct circuit' source of the L, rather than a 'different floor L' which could/would have been the case in the absence of the third core.
Functionally, there was absolutely nothing wrong with what I had, and it did not involve the potential problem (EM radiation etc.) of an 'unaccompanied conductor'.
Kind Regards, John