- Joined
- 9 May 2020
- Messages
- 7,395
- Reaction score
- 136
- Country
Exactly, I was being generous and accepting the 80% as factual. Clearly it isn't anymore, but I was still being generous.
- Status
Sponsored Links
If the doctors say he needs it, then I'd go with them. It might be that his lung function is a bit hammered, in which case he might need supplemental oxygen until/unless he recovers it.
To be absolutely certain; what is the definition of a covid "case"?
Is it one who has tested positive - whether symptomatic or not?
Is it one who has tested positive - whether symptomatic or not?
D
durhamplumber
The more you go out and spread it...The less time doctors have to treat others...Fewer covid = more time to treat others..Elective treatment has to take second place to wards full of suddenly v ill people with Covid....I cannot make it any simpler for you..same with economy..The more you fuk around the longer we stay in the worse the economy...SIMPLESHow do you work that one, Einstein? Remember that The UK has the worst Covid 'stats' if they are to be believed, and hospitals have all but stopped treating certain, non-Covid conditions. The economy is on the critical list too. But it's my fault.
You've lost it.
Last edited by a moderator:
Sponsored Links
Try telling that to my GP, even when there was bugger all covid , they just shut up shop, and left a recorded message about what the 'rona symptoms were, and what to do if you had them.
Yes.
Ok.
From Worldometer today:
Now that the UK has restarted entering the recovered number, we can see that the numbers add up and tally.
3,617,459 Total cases - between 20% and 80% asymptomatic.
_,_97,329 Deaths
1,616,307 Recovered
1,903,823 Active cases
There have been 67 million tests but we cannot deduce what proportion of the population has been tested.
From the BBC yesterday there were 36,562 in hospital - ~10% of the total cases - so 1,867,261 are active cases but not in hospital; what does that mean?
Therefore, we cannot tell from the total cases how many have been ill, nor how many were asymptomatic and never ill or asymptomatic but ill soon after.
As the recovered number is approaching half the total number, does that mean some have 'recovered' without ever being ill or they have all been ill.
Of course, ~63,000,000 have not been tested positive.
What do all the numbers, including the positive tests and the deaths which likely are exaggerated, actually represent?
Some people have been tested multiple times.
Those numbers don't mean what you think they mean. Or they aren't accurate. I can't find the exact page you're looking at.
Antibody testing shows around 12.5% have had, and recovered from, Covid-19. That's around 8.4 million or so.
It's hard to be polite when you stick this sort of sillyness at the end.
What have I spread? Do you have proof?
.The more you fuk around the longer we stay in the worse the economy...SIMPLES
Total garbage as usual from the head forum sheep. We can't control the lockdown, the government are controlling it. They've just brought in legislation to keep us in lockdown until July 17th. If lockdowns work, why do we need to stay in them for 6 months? How do they know that we need to stay in lockdown until then? It's because it's nothing to do with the numbers.
Suppose you were gullible enough to believe that we're only in lockdown to bring numbers down. Just a few weeks to flatten the curve. The vaccine will save us.
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2020/750/regulation/19
You're the sort of fat kid who doesn't get diets. Just because you ate a salad for the first time ever last week doesn't mean you're rocking a six pack this week.
Add to that 12%, those whose antibodies have waned and are now undetectable.
- Joined
- 17 May 2012
- Messages
- 10,784
- Reaction score
- 849
- Country
But Sir Patrick probably hasn't seen all the hospitals with empty covid wards that you can see from the front reception. He probably hasn't even watched the videos of people walking around empty corridors at night. What does he really know!!?!?!?
</sarcasm>
</sarcasm>
Last edited:
I think you said that before and I replied I think it is what (most) people look at.
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/
That's why I first asked the definition of 'case'. Is that not a 'test' or 'case'?
If that is correct, how can there only have been 3.6 million cases?
If you mean 'exaggerated' then it is undeniable that there are false positives (false negatives presumably are found to be positive later) and, of course the deaths are any death within sixty days of a positive test so might not all be accurate.
It's always best to remain polite - just in case.
Oh dear:
https://www.euronews.com/2021/01/18/bavaria-makes-ffp2-masks-mandatory-in-shops-and-public-transport
- Status
Sponsored Links
