Some improvement in tax.

Joined
15 Nov 2005
Messages
96,649
Reaction score
8,175
Location
South
Country
Cook Islands
"Elizabeth Bratton in London
Published 12 HOURS AGO

HM Revenue & Customs collected an extra £16bn from the biggest businesses last year after it took a “more hands-on approach” with dedicated officials and more fines, the National Audit Office found.

The amount of extra tax obtained from the 2,000 largest businesses as a result of HMRC’s intervention doubled over the past three years, the report said.

The NAO said: “HMRC takes a more hands-on approach than with other taxpayers due to the complex nature of large businesses and the scale of the revenue collected.

”The government’s squeezed finances have heaped further pressure on HMRC to close the so-called tax gap — the difference between what companies should, and do, pay in tax.
For large businesses, HMRC estimated this was £5.8bn in 2023-24, compared with £7.5bn in 2005-06.The NAO said the increased tax collection was partly due to its increased use of penalties and growing use of data analysis.

The NAO said HMRC had issued 636 penalties to large businesses in 2024-25, compared with 164 in 2021-22, although 71 per cent of the fines over those four years were suspended because the businesses had co-operated well or stopped their non-compliant behaviour.

Overall, HMRC collected £337bn from about 2,000 of the UK’s largest businesses in 2024-25, according to the report.The NAO’s report found that HMRC’s analysis and data profiling was limited by legacy IT systems, which should be improved as part of the £1.6bn it received in the Spending Review.

Large companies are typically more compliant with HMRC than smaller businesses and account for just 12 per cent of the overall tax gap — but HMRC was justified in pursuing them because, individually the lost tax was higher, about £3mn each on average, the NAO said.

HMRC’s large business directorate was also found to have a return on investment of £95 for every £1 spent on staff pay, which is four times higher than what the agency achieves across all taxpayers.

Sir Geoffrey Clifton-Brown, chair of the public accounts committee, said the extra £15.8bn collected by the department showed “a clear example of an effective approach that represents a good return on investment”

FT.com
 
Last edited:
Are you still using all your tax dodging allowances John? Do you think others should too, if it’s legal?
 
Last edited:
Well, yes, those who carry on (staying in the country, staying employed, maintaining their hours worked etc.) will pay more. But those who then drop-out... close that business, don't start that side-project, don't expand, relocate abroad, choose to live off others etc. will pay less.

Hasn't the Laffer curve shown up a few times? Didn't the 50p tax rate do this? Or am I thinking of 45p?
 
The Laffer/laugher curve cuts in at 24% - the rate at which people pay CGT . Or in many cases, choose not to.

Scenario - you're a gen whateveritis and have inherited the family pile. Let's assume it's in London, so it's 500k.
You stick the lump into a "Spread betting" account, which is treated as gambling for tax purposes, though effectively it's just like a share dealing/buying/trading/ callitwhatyoulike platform. IG is one, there are several.
You don't pay tax on gambling gains. Theoretically HMRC could start to chase it, but I think they're just too busy.

So when you get a week like the one we just had:
1772230584713.png


These are all standard funds at Hargreaves Lansdown and all the other places, like AJ Bell, ii, Fidelity, etc.
You can go a lot more aggressive. Using the yellow one mostly , spreading things a bit, in round numbers your gain is 10% on the week.
And I'm an old git, a bit disabled so using the NHS a lot and getting PIP. ( Pension and pip fill up the next year's ISA, which means no tax on that anyway.)
I don't pay any National Insurance either, being a poor old age pensioner.

In case you think that's exceptional, not really. There's a 3x version of that yellow thing, so near 40% in the week.
If those top 2 weren't available, the blue one has been doing the same for "ages".
And there are many other ways to do things. All "ordinary". You just get money, and the major point is: whether you pay tax, is up to you.

I'm not exceptional in any way, I can assure you. I'm not clever and don't have a financial certificate of any sort, and I'm lazy.
Imagine what some people could get up to.
Bloody ridiculous. Someone should tell Aunty Rache. (In fact - tax apart - someone in HMG should be doing similar things, to earn the country some cash.)
 
Well, yes, those who carry on (staying in the country, staying employed, maintaining their hours worked etc.) will pay more. But those who then drop-out... close that business, don't start that side-project, don't expand, relocate abroad, choose to live off others etc. will pay less.
You forgot about those deported.
 
Back
Top