Someday this War's gonna End

[King Billy]

it’s your opinion over mine.

It's not your opinion, it's your unsupported accusation. See the difference?
And still no evidence to support your hypothesis.

More people will agree with me than you.

So accusations are true if based on a group (who frequently demonstrate islamophobia), but unsupportrd by evidence?

Odds is a holocaust denier.

Where is the post proving your accusation?

 

[King Billy]

Can you try and make sense please. This is why not many people read your posts.

If you can't understand plain English, it's not anyone else's problem. it's yours, own it.

 

[King Billy]

Have never seen or read any of the fruit cakes posts

So you can't support, and don't share Dec27's opinion.

 

[King Billy]

He’s obviously a bitter nutter. I’d say a spambot, but they are programmed to have a bit of personality

And just how are your persistent and continuous posts on the same subject any different?

 

[King Billy]

reported. Absolutely unacceptable slander. even for trolls.

Sadly, it will have little effect. Trolls can, and do, make ludicrous, egregious, and potentially slanderous comments without restraint or repercussions.

 

[King Billy]

It’s not slander one bit. Let’s go through it.

You're right it's libel.
Slander is a type of defamation involving false, spoken statements or gestures that damage a person's or business's reputation. It is a transient, oral form of slander, distinct from written libel. It requires proof of actual words spoken and, in many cases, specific financial loss, unless it involves accusations of crime or professional misconduct.
Libel is much easier to prove. It's recorded in writing. And as you refuse or can't present any evidence to support your accusation, it's an open and shut case.

 

[King Billy]

I’ve obviously touched a nerve.

Lies about anyone usually touches nerves.

 

[King Billy]

you have a problem with that?

Of course he does, he's a fellow troll, who resorts to lies himself.
He thinks egregious and lying accusations are par for the course.

 

[King Billy]

He seems to think you’re being a 9rick…

He usually is.
But don't let me stop you rallying the troops.

 

[King Billy]

Can you go and play in another thread please. You’re tiresome

You want the freedom to spout your lying, nefarious accusations without being questioned about them?

 

[King Billy]

Seriously - try being honest and truthful for a change.

Leopards - spots?

 

[King Billy]

Odds has had innumerable posts and indeed entire threads deleted purely and simply because.....

You, MBK, koolpc, et al have falsely reported him for anti-Semitism.

 

[King Billy]

If anyone wants to sue me, I can guarantee you they wont be successful, go on morq, give it a try.

You're right, for 2 reasons.
1) Nobody knows who you are.
2) Your opinions have no importance, or significance in the real world.

Only because we are anonymous people on the internet*.
The perpetrator is not anonymous because real identities are easily obtained.
It's the victim's identity, and their potential damage, that is the crux of the matter.
If we had disclosed our true identity, and we could demonstrate material damage, it would be an open and shut case.
If Odds had disclosed his true identity, you would never dare to say, or write such things.
Which proves that you are exploiting the anonymity of DIYnot to make nefarious accusations.

*It's why I go to great lengths to not disclose any clue to my true identity.
I couldn't be bothered to pursue even an open and shut legal case.
If I did I would be mired in numerous legal cases. And still the tolls would persist with their lying egregious accusations.
I'm content to allow them to expose themselves for what they really are, trolls. Current and potential members can be forewarned that trolls exist.

 

[Dec27]

reported. Absolutely unacceptable slander. even for trolls.

I see my post is still here. Maybe the Mods have been busy.

 

[Dec27]

You're right it's libel.
Slander is a type of defamation involving false, spoken statements or gestures that damage a person's or business's reputation. It is a transient, oral form of slander, distinct from written libel. It requires proof of actual words spoken and, in many cases, specific financial loss, unless it involves accusations of crime or professional misconduct.
Libel is much easier to prove. It's recorded in writing. And as you refuse or can't present any evidence to support your accusation, it's an open and shut case.

Himbot have a break.

I won’t play into your nonsense