Starmer destroys the UK

and some more

.. fish in a barrel
Read the article!
...promised to reduce post-Brexit red tape and costs for UK companies doing business with the UK's biggest export market, the EU....
to reduce the burden on businesses exporting sausages, for example, to Northern Ireland and the EU,...
Critics say...
:rolleyes:
 
You really don't think Starmer is attempting to re-join in all but name?
Different argument.
I suspect you do, but you don't want people talking about it, in the hope that he gets away with it. He won't.
You would have to be certifiably insane to not want closer ties to Europe, under the current US dictatorship. As do a majority of the UK public.
 
Morning all, back from a nice break, thought id pop my nose in to see if we have all made up :D

Am just sitting here with my morning coffee wondering how that little weasel has still managed to hang on as our leader. Boris managed the same buffooning and blustering while on the surface the country ground to a political halt, and here we are again. This knob jockey doing the same, however i find it even more infuriating because his lot are the cause of so much money wasted in excess litigation, making it 'ok' to bend and interpret any and every law costing us b/millions each year..

You can hear the back office discussions:

Right so tha plan is basically we stick to this:

Instruction: “Inform the PM if vetting fails.”
Response: “We interpreted ‘inform’ as ‘ensure the information exists somewhere in government.’ That threshold was met.”

Did we comply? Yes we did our side we sat there with our ear out the window the whole time, noone came to us, despite us knowing full well the risky character.
Its akin to takin on one of Putins back benchers to enable us to strike a deal with Putin and then acting surprised he failed UKSV.

Starmer will stick to the interpretation of the print, irrespective of the truth, he has proven time over morally, he has zero morals, the lying cheating lowlife, in this instance he and Trump are similar they both lie and pull 180s the difference being Starmer would insist he never changed tack the ship did(sack the crew!!), he didn't!

Just on Reform im finding Farage increasingly frustrating, the stupid pyrotechnics and jets of dry ice take me back to my days of rushing off my t'ts in various clubs, not in a pre conference buildup. Restore britain is the way forward.

Also on another note i lol'd at our Lee in the HOC's yesterday saying Starmer couldn't Lie straight in bed, another observation, when Ed Davey finally gets nasty the curtains must be near, youve got to be bad for this chap to start punching, he's too nice. Oh and a little shout to Abacus, she put the boot in too and rightly so. Go on f off you lying weasel.
 
Morning all, back from a nice break, thought id pop my nose in to see if we have all made up :D

Am just sitting here with my morning coffee wondering how that little weasel has still managed to hang on as our leader. Boris managed the same buffooning and blustering while on the surface the country ground to a political halt, and here we are again. This knob jockey doing the same, however i find it even more infuriating because his lot are the cause of so much money wasted in excess litigation, making it 'ok' to bend and interpret any and every law costing us b/millions each year..

You can hear the back office discussions:

Right so tha plan is basically we stick to this:

Instruction: “Inform the PM if vetting fails.”
Response: “We interpreted ‘inform’ as ‘ensure the information exists somewhere in government.’ That threshold was met.”

Did we comply? Yes we did our side we sat there with our ear out the window the whole time, noone came to us, despite us knowing full well the risky character.
Its akin to takin on one of Putins back benchers to enable us to strike a deal with Putin and then acting surprised he failed UKSV.

Starmer will stick to the interpretation of the print, irrespective of the truth, he has proven time over morally, he has zero morals, the lying cheating lowlife, in this instance he and Trump are similar they both lie and pull 180s the difference being Starmer would insist he never changed tack the ship did(sack the crew!!), he didn't!

Just on Reform im finding Farage increasingly frustrating, the stupid pyrotechnics and jets of dry ice take me back to my days of rushing off my t'ts in various clubs, not in a pre conference buildup. Restore britain is the way forward.

Also on another note i lol'd at our Lee in the HOC's yesterday saying Starmer couldn't Lie straight in bed, another observation, when Ed Davey finally gets nasty the curtains must be near, youve got to be bad for this chap to start punching, he's too nice. Oh and a little shout to Abacus, she put the boot in too and rightly so. Go on f off you lying weasel.

Olly's giving his version of events to MP's this morning. Could be interesting.
 
Olly's giving his version of events to MP's this morning. Could be interesting.
Good morning FB, indeed but isnt this what the little lying Weasel is counting on? I am sure they have done their 'due diligence' already assuming he will say 'i stuck to internal process i wasn't obliged to inform the PM direct' the focus then turns to Lammy, he is the next in the chain in escalation...

Then here we go again. 'Lets be clear Lammy... you need to take one for the team'

The underneath of the no.10 bus must be absolutely splattered with human remains by now.
 
I was suspicious at the time because its always people with a grudge - like you because the EU would not let you in to your partners country so he/ she went and left you here on your own. So I looked them up and sure enough -- remainers.
PMSL...

You got your facts wrong as usual, but what we else do expect from someone trying to defend the indefensible :rolleyes:

But here's something that can be checked and verified...

Not a single brexiteer has come up with a single tangible benefit of brexit...

The very best anyone can come up with are that a few things haven't changed...

Pathetic!

At least Starmer is trying to put things right for the UK!
 
Morning all, back from a nice break, thought id pop my nose in to see if we have all made up :D

Am just sitting here with my morning coffee wondering how that little weasel has still managed to hang on as our leader. Boris managed the same buffooning and blustering while on the surface the country ground to a political halt, and here we are again. This knob jockey doing the same, however i find it even more infuriating because his lot are the cause of so much money wasted in excess litigation, making it 'ok' to bend and interpret any and every law costing us b/millions each year..

You can hear the back office discussions:

Right so tha plan is basically we stick to this:

Instruction: “Inform the PM if vetting fails.”
Response: “We interpreted ‘inform’ as ‘ensure the information exists somewhere in government.’ That threshold was met.”

Did we comply? Yes we did our side we sat there with our ear out the window the whole time, noone came to us, despite us knowing full well the risky character.
Its akin to takin on one of Putins back benchers to enable us to strike a deal with Putin and then acting surprised he failed UKSV.

Starmer will stick to the interpretation of the print, irrespective of the truth, he has proven time over morally, he has zero morals, the lying cheating lowlife, in this instance he and Trump are similar they both lie and pull 180s the difference being Starmer would insist he never changed tack the ship did(sack the crew!!), he didn't!

Just on Reform im finding Farage increasingly frustrating, the stupid pyrotechnics and jets of dry ice take me back to my days of rushing off my t'ts in various clubs, not in a pre conference buildup. Restore britain is the way forward.

Also on another note i lol'd at our Lee in the HOC's yesterday saying Starmer couldn't Lie straight in bed, another observation, when Ed Davey finally gets nasty the curtains must be near, youve got to be bad for this chap to start punching, he's too nice. Oh and a little shout to Abacus, she put the boot in too and rightly so. Go on f off you lying weasel.
Borris by supporting brexhit and then making a crap deal harmed the country in a way only Starmmer’s enemies could only dream of.
Robins made what he thought was the right decision based on his understanding of all the circumstances, including the PM’s views. Passing or failing vetting is Mandy’s case would have been subjective and a question of balance. What the MPs can’t do is ask him to reveal information that would threaten national security. So I don’t think we’ll be any the wiser in a few hours time.
 
Borris by supporting brexhit and then making a crap deal harmed the country in a way only Starmmer’s enemies could only dream of.
Robins made what he thought was the right decision based on his understanding of all the circumstances, including the PM’s views. Passing or failing vetting is Mandy’s case would have been subjective and a question of balance. What the MPs can’t do is ask him to reveal information that would threaten national security. So I don’t think we’ll be any the wiser in a few hours time.
Starmer was told, don't pull the trigger until he has passed vetting - starmer didn't wait.
Mandy fails vetting - Starmer didn't know.

implausible deniability.
 
Borris by supporting brexhit and then making a crap deal harmed the country in a way only Starmmer’s enemies could only dream of.
Robins made what he thought was the right decision based on his understanding of all the circumstances, including the PM’s views. Passing or failing vetting is Mandy’s case would have been subjective and a question of balance. What the MPs can’t do is ask him to reveal information that would threaten national security. So I don’t think we’ll be any the wiser in a few hours time.
I'm in support of Starmer for what he's doing in respect of the illegal war, closer ties with Europe, and as has been shown the recent upgrading of growth and lowering of unemployment means the UK might well have turned the corner had it not been for said illegal war which will impact later...

An illegal war which of course was initially supported by the right wing parties that many of the critics of Starmer on here seem to worship!

And they also deride Europe for also standing up to the orange rapist and the war criminal which also says a lot...

Having said that, if there is any truth in Starmer having known about a vetting failure, then he must go.

Politics is a dirty game, but were he to have been aware when it involved a creep like Mandelson, then it would be imo an untenable situation!
 
I'm in support of Starmer for what he's doing in respect of the illegal war, closer ties with Europe, and as has been shown the recent upgrading of growth and lowering of unemployment means the UK might well have turned the corner had it not been for said illegal war which will impact later...

An illegal war which of course was initially supported by the right wing parties that many of the critics of Starmer on here seem to worship!

And they also deride Europe for also standing up to the orange rapist and the war criminal which also says a lot...

Having said that, if there is any truth in Starmer having known about a vetting failure, then he must go.

Politics is a dirty game, but were he to have been aware when it involved a creep like Mandelson, then it would be imo an untenable situation!


Not much growth occurring, unless you mean the number of jobless.
 
Starmer was told, don't pull the trigger until he has passed vetting - starmer didn't wait.
Mandy fails vetting - Starmer didn't know.

implausible deniability.
The PM made the political decision not to wait, he was dealing with Trumpy McTrumpface. Robins did his job on a fairly balanced - ie could go either way - vetting decision
 
Not much growth occurring, unless you mean the number of jobless.
You're out of date as usual...

"UK unemployment rate drops unexpectedly"

Linky Linky

"UK GDP expanded by a stronger than expected 0.5% in February, official figures show, suggesting the economy was gaining momentum before the onset of war in the Middle East dashed hopes of recovery"

Linky Linky

No doubt you'll fill up several pages with trying to unsuccessfully prove that black is white ;)
 
You pay a small fee to become a member of a 'club' such as Cosco for example, and reap far greater benefits through lower costs :rolleyes:
You could also pay a fee to your local mafia, and in return they won't smash your windows. Or you can toughen up and stand up to them, which they and their traitorous supporters will be strongly against.
 
Back
Top