- Joined
- 7 Nov 2023
- Messages
- 19,129
- Reaction score
- 11,942
- Country

Attack the post not the man. !!!!He's big into narcissism, so big he's unaware of it.
Reported

Attack the post not the man. !!!!He's big into narcissism, so big he's unaware of it.

I don’t need you to paste me ChatGPT’s AI slop; I can get it to tell me whatever I want to hear perfectly well myselfA military defensive role involves operations designed to defeat an enemy attack, gain time, economize forces, and develop conditions favorable for regaining the initiative. Unlike a passive stance, a military defense is an active and deliberate strategy that utilizes fortified positions, terrain advantages, and counterattacks to destroy enemy forces or force them to halt their advance

So why you asking then?I don’t need you to paste me ChatGPT’s AI slop; I can get it to tell me whatever I want to hear perfectly well myself
Please tell me what military movements we should have made, eg what kind of personnel and equipment, where they should have come from, where they should have been deployed to and what they should have done when they got there

Stop being ridiculous. I am not here to explain everything to you. All you need to know is we wasn't there. Simples.I don’t need you to paste me ChatGPT’s AI slop; I can get it to tell me whatever I want to hear perfectly well myself
Please tell me what military movements we should have made, eg what kind of personnel and equipment, where they should have come from, where they should have been deployed to and what they should have done when they got there

What a surprise, you resort to your usual behaviour.Attack the post not the man. !!!!
Reported

What a surprise you need reportingWhat a surprise, you resort to your usual behaviour.![]()

ReportedWhat a surprise, you resort to your usual behaviour.![]()

Welcome to the world of the narcisitic buffoon.I don’t need you to paste me ChatGPT’s AI slop; I can get it to tell me whatever I want to hear perfectly well myself
Please tell me what military movements we should have made, eg what kind of personnel and equipment, where they should have come from, where they should have been deployed to and what they should have done when they got there

ReportedWelcome to the world of the narcisitic buffoon.

For exploring your nebulous responses to direct questions.What a surprise you need reporting

ReportedFor exploring your nebulous responses to direct questions.
You're just not up to sensible discussions.
Trolling is your only avenue.

From the start, Sir Keir could have said that while the UK could not support offensive military operations on legal grounds, it could instead deploy alongside American forces or Gulf allies in a purely ‘defensive’ counter-missile and counter-drone role. This would have seemingly satisfied the Prime Minister’s legal concerns and domestic political considerations, while reaffirming British reliability and credibility and softening the rejection for Trump.I don’t need you to paste me ChatGPT’s AI slop; I can get it to tell me whatever I want to hear perfectly well myself
Please tell me what military movements we should have made, eg what kind of personnel and equipment, where they should have come from, where they should have been deployed to and what they should have done when they got there

OK, Trolling and Reporting.Reported

Already have answered, although none of your concern.OK, Trolling and Reporting.
You repeat something you might have heard, but when asked to elucidate, you resort to outbursts and the inevitable "Reported" because you're unable to explain what you meant.
It's the same with using words that you might have heard, but when asked to explain yourself, you resort to your typical trolling or reporting.

It's academic etiquette to quote your source.From the start, Sir Keir could have said that while the UK could not support offensive military operations on legal grounds, it could instead deploy alongside American forces or Gulf allies in a purely ‘defensive’ counter-missile and counter-drone role. This would have seemingly satisfied the Prime Minister’s legal concerns and domestic political considerations, while reaffirming British reliability and credibility and softening the rejection for Trump.
Indeed, deciding after the fact to deploy British forces to defend Cyprus and sail HMS Dragon to the region (which should have been done in the first place) only reinforces that Sir Keir’s original decision was ill-considered and politically costly.