Syrians

[Notch7]

But it's OK to leave them at risk of being raped and murdered?

In Syria it’s mostly the men who get persecuted…..pressured to join Assad’s regime, the women often end up in refugee camps.

 

[Notch7]

But those already in France aren't at risk.

Why should France take them instead of U.K.?

 

[fixitflav]

Why should France take them instead of U.K.?

France shouldn't, and neither should UK

 

[Deleted member 317777]

It isn't about want or need, it is about helping fellow human beings who need it.

And leaving uk citizens homeless in the process.

Ok.

 

[Deleted member 317777]

That's great in principle, but the problem is distinguishing the genuine needy from economic migrants, mostly male, who are happy to leave their women and children in supposedly dangerous places.

This

 

[Deleted member 317777]

• Between 2015 and 2020, approximately 16,350 refugees were resettled in England and Wales under the Vulnerable Persons Resettlement Scheme (VPRS) and the Vulnerable Children's Resettlement Scheme (VCRS).
• Those resettled are primarily of Syrian nationality (91%), with slightly higher proportions of males (52%) than females (48%), and around half (50%) aged under 18 years on arrival; two years after arrival, most are still living in the local authority where they were first resettled (over 80%).

Early integration outcomes for refugees resettled in England and Wales - Office for National Statistics

New analysis on refugees resettled between 2015 and 2020 under the Vulnerable Persons and Vulnerable Children’s Resettlement Schemes in England and Wales.

www.ons.gov.uk

It’s 4 years out of date……

Cheers.

 

[Deleted member 317777]

Ask fixthelav for more uptodate figures.

No need.

 

[Gone Skiing]

No need.

You're not interested in more uptodate figures then?

 

[Deleted member 317777]

You're not interested in more uptodate figures then?

Did I say that

 

[Gone Skiing]

Did I say that

Clearly you were, at one point concerned about the data being uptodate. But when it was suggested you ask the originator of the issue, for more uptodate figures, you decided it wasn't needed.
Thus, either a) it wasn't important, b) or you had the more uptodate figures, in which case you would have provided them, but you didn't for reasons unknown, c) or you were just making silly, unhelpful comments.
Which was it?

It’s 4 years out of date……

Cheers.

Ask fixthelav for more uptodate figures.

No need.

You're not interested in more uptodate figures then?

 

[Deleted member 317777]

Clearly you were, at one point concerned about the data being uptodate. But when it was suggested you ask the originator of the issue, for more uptodate figures, you decided it wasn't needed.
Thus, either a) it wasn't important, b) or you had the more uptodate figures, in which case you would have provided them, but you didn't for reasons unknown, c) or you were just making silly, unhelpful comments.
Which was it?

I said it’s out of date. It is!

 

[Deleted member 317777]

Ask fixthelav for more uptodate figures.

Was it his link ?

Hmmmmm

 

[Gone Skiing]

I said it’s out of date. It is!

You don't know if it's out of date if you don't have more uptodate figures.
You'll need to produce later figures to support your claim.

 

[Gone Skiing]

Was it his link ?

Hmmmmm

It was his claim to which Denso provided the real data.
Keep up. Or at least try to.

 

[fillyboy]

Many of whom have conveniently 'misplaced' all their ID documents.

Urban mythology doing the rounds yet again.

98% of Channel boat migrants have no passport - Migration Watch UK

Just 2% of the thousands who have made their way to the UK illegally in small boats via the English Channel were found to be in possession of a passport at the time of being processed in the UK. The finding emerged in the wake of official data being published in a Home Office freedom […]

www.migrationwatchuk.org