Exactly - the records do not go back far enough. And by the way part of the scam is that its CO2 that is the problem, which is the only way they are grifting the man made rubbish.
-
Looking for a smarter way to manage your heating this winter? We’ve been testing the new Aqara Radiator Thermostat W600 to see how quiet, accurate and easy it is to use around the home. Click here read our review.
The Far-right Delusion
- Thread starter Odds
- Start date
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 22,977
- Reaction score
- 3,067
- Country
That is just nonsensical garbage.
- Joined
- 25 Jul 2022
- Messages
- 17,851
- Reaction score
- 1,500
- Country
I prefer the world wide scientists version
- Joined
- 25 Jul 2022
- Messages
- 17,851
- Reaction score
- 1,500
- Country
So what evidence do you have? Let's look at it ?
- Joined
- 25 Jul 2022
- Messages
- 17,851
- Reaction score
- 1,500
- Country
No. The idiots decide they know better than scientists from all over the world
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 22,977
- Reaction score
- 3,067
- Country
It's just physics and chemistry. You can even do your own experiments to show what the effects are if you want,
How Exactly Does Carbon Dioxide Cause Global Warming?
CO2 molecules make up only a small percentage of the atmosphere, but their impact on our climate is huge. The reason comes down to physics and chemistry.
news.climate.columbia.edu
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 22,977
- Reaction score
- 3,067
- Country
The research shows that it is greenhouse gases causing the problem. It isn't about blame.
The process by which carbon dioxide warms the atmosphere has been known about for almost 150 years. Only an idiot would deny the basic scientific principle.
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 22,977
- Reaction score
- 3,067
- Country
Who found that out? Was it scientists by any chance? Where did you find the info?
- Joined
- 25 Jul 2022
- Messages
- 17,851
- Reaction score
- 1,500
- Country
Thought you said records didn't go back far enough.
How was the comparative speed of change ?
And at some point all life on earth was wiped out or at some point the earth was unfit for habitation.
Do you see where folk are going with it yet, durr.
You do know that we are dangerously close the earth to not have enough CO2 to sustain plant life.
The ambient level of CO2 in the atmosphere is approximately 400 PPM. At 100 PPM of CO2 the rate of photosynthesis would be stopped completely. At 150 PPM the plants begin to respire, and photosynthesis is stopped. At this low level the plant will no longer be able to obtain CO2 from the atmosphere and photosynthesis is restricted. The plant will eventually use all of the CO2 present, photosynthesis will stop and the plant will die.
The rate of photosynthesis at 350 PPM will be consistent with growing conditions outside of a controlled environment, given that ambient levels of CO2 in the atmosphere are approximately 400 PPM.
With no other limiting factors such as heat, light and nutrients the plants will photosynthesize at a rate consistent with ambient conditions (i.e. outside of the greenhouse). There may be a slight increase in photosynthetic efficiency due to the higher than ambient CO2 level, however this increase will probably be insignificant. The level of 1000 PPM CO2 is very close to the optimum level of CO2 required, given no other limiting factor, 1200 PPM, to allow a plant to photosynthesis at the maximum rate.
The ambient level of CO2 in the atmosphere is approximately 400 PPM. At 100 PPM of CO2 the rate of photosynthesis would be stopped completely. At 150 PPM the plants begin to respire, and photosynthesis is stopped. At this low level the plant will no longer be able to obtain CO2 from the atmosphere and photosynthesis is restricted. The plant will eventually use all of the CO2 present, photosynthesis will stop and the plant will die.
The rate of photosynthesis at 350 PPM will be consistent with growing conditions outside of a controlled environment, given that ambient levels of CO2 in the atmosphere are approximately 400 PPM.
With no other limiting factors such as heat, light and nutrients the plants will photosynthesize at a rate consistent with ambient conditions (i.e. outside of the greenhouse). There may be a slight increase in photosynthetic efficiency due to the higher than ambient CO2 level, however this increase will probably be insignificant. The level of 1000 PPM CO2 is very close to the optimum level of CO2 required, given no other limiting factor, 1200 PPM, to allow a plant to photosynthesis at the maximum rate.
I think folk are trying to tell you that if we carry on at the current rate of change - humans will die out.
