The most frightening video you will ever watch

Yes he said that in the first video of his I posted, just before going on to list all of his other, more relevant qualifications and experience in human vaccinology. including being mainly concerned with the design of human vaccines.
Maybe he's also an amateur chef,would that disqualify his opinion too???
 
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
I see they didn't mention the two deaths caused by blood clotting that have persuaded nine Europen countries to halt the use of the AstraZeneca jabs for the time being.
 
Good news, the UK is going to double the rate we vaccinate!

The NHS is to double the number of vaccinations against Covid-19 to five million a week, paving the way for a mass programme of second jabs.

Deaths due to the virus have fallen by 62 per cent in a fortnight and health sources say the decline in fatalities is accelerating.

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/...deaths-and-hospital-cases-fall-fast-7r3pm56n8

Which really means the number of people getting their first jab each week will stay around the same, but we'll also be going back for the second jab for everyone.
 
Not got time to read at the mo but would welcome anyone else giving their opinion of it (without it descending into a bitch-fest of arguing)
 
It's important to note, his letter is a "call to action", it is not in any way a study or scientific report.

From reading what he says, he is making his claim based on these points:

1. Asymptomatic people are superspreaders
2. Asymptomatic people are asymptomatic because they are clearing the virus with innate immunity (Natural Killer cells and "secondary IgM" antibodies according to him-- I think he means IgA).
3. Adapative immunity from vaccine-induced antibodies suppresses innate immunity.
4. Therefore vaccinating people enhances replication, shedding and immune escape.
5. We can expect wave after wave of death and destruction because of this.

Sooey please can you explain why: there are no references, evidence or anything anywhere to back up these claims


There is lots evidence against 1. As for 2 and 3, usually innate immunity is actually associated more with symptoms. There are some papers showing that immunity using cytotoxic T-cells (perhaps with a memory of similar viruses) suppress innate immunity. But this is a good thing.

Those memory "cytotoxic" (which just means cell-killing-- they kill infected cells directly) cells hang out near your lungs etc. clone themselves and zap anything they recognize and let you get on with your life. This is all good.
 
I see they didn't mention the two deaths caused by blood clotting that have persuaded nine Europen countries to halt the use of the AstraZeneca jabs for the time being.

Let's put this in context:

As of March 9th 22 cases of blood clotting have been reported out of 3 million vaccines.


And:

The problem with spontaneous reports of suspected adverse reactions to a vaccine are the enormous difficulty of distinguishing a causal effect from a coincidence," he said, adding that the Covid-19 disease was very strongly associated with blood clotting


And

On Wednesday, EMA, Europe's medicines watchdog, said a preliminary probe showed that the batch of AstraZeneca vaccines used in Austria was likely not to blame for the nurse's death

And

Europe’s drug regulator, the European Medicines Agency, stressed on Thursday that there was no indication the shot was causing blood clots, adding it believes the vaccine’s benefits “continue to outweigh its risks.
 
3. Adapative immunity from vaccine-induced antibodies suppresses innate immunity.
That'd be very interesting, and would fly in the face of previous vaccines. Why now and never before?
 
Sooey please can you explain why: there are no references, evidence or anything anywhere to back up these claims
The reason there is no evidence to back up his claims is because conspiracy theories don't require real evidence.
 
It's important to note, his letter is a "call to action", it is not in any way a study or scientific report.

Letters generally aren't.

His call to action was to ask the WHO to call a halt and debate their next actions with him and whichever other world renowned virological scientists they chose.
Hardly the actions of a charlatan, he obviously knows that he has got the science behind him to back up whatever he is planning to say.

Have you actually watched that video?
There were a number of other claims he made.
For a start he repeated the claims made by thousands of doctors world wide that lock downs and face masks were the absolute worst thing that could be done in the face of a new virus, which only the very old or otherwise immuno compromised are vulnerable to.
Everybody else should be out there as normal intermingling and catching the virus, because everybody is born with an immune system that can handle it, and catching that virus makes everybody's immune system stronger .
As those doctors all say, the vulnerable should be shielded while the rest of us get on with our lives.
He said a lot more than that, talking about how using a prophylactic vaccine while in the middle of a pandemic is the worst time to use it.
And doing so will result in turning what started as a relatively mild virus into a deadly killer on the lines of the more deadly virus's that we know.
Put that together with his claim that the body's innate immune system will be severly hampered and prevented from doing it's job by the vaccine, which targets the original covid virus, and which will be a lot less effective against all the new variants which he says are coming out, and which he says are brought about by using the vaccines while in the middle of a pandemic.
He says that the current actions will lead to a steep drop off in death rates, then a plateau of some length, then an ever steeper rise in death rates as the new, stronger variants develop, which the vaccines, and the body's immune system can not handle.
And the ever stronger variants will be just as dangerous to those like myself who will never take the vaccine.
In other words, this absolute advocate of vaccines is saying that you people taking that potion are going to kill us all.
If you want to know the science behind his claims watch the video.
 
those doctors all say, the vulnerable should be shielded while the rest of us get on with our lives
There is no evidence that is achievable.

The vulnerable can't be identified nor can they be adequately shielded.

You do realise the vulnerable list is literally millions of people in this country.


No herd immunity advocate has ever provided any serious study or evidence on numbers of expected deaths nor how shielding could be done.
 
Evidence proves otherwise.
And you are more qualified to evaluate evidence than that man I suppose.

I forgot about about the DIYNOT panel of experts in everything.

If you can't be arzed to watch the video, and then form a judgement, your attempted arguments have no merit.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top