Toilets and changing rooms

I think KB meant the particular anatomy of that particular person.

I imagine that a great many 14-year olds know what the "opposite sex" look like even without the benefit of PSHE or science lessons.
Think about prejudiced parents teaching their children to adopt their prejudices, coupled with easy access to lurid Porn.

They're like children whistling at women in the street as they pass them in a car, because that's what their Dad used to do.
They were taught that way, and they don't have the intelligence to question it.
 
No it wasn't mentioned at school, let kids grow and find out for themselves, don't put nonsense into their heads.
Let's not teach our children then. let them find out about everything by their own curiosity.
Under-age pregnancoes, STDs will abound. That's your policy?
 
Does anyone else just Scroll bast Billy's posts? They a so long winded and boring.
Im not sure hes is real. At least we know Nosey is for real.
 
Until my child comes to me and says they want to be a girl or boy (whichever way round) I wont mention it, theres no need to

If my son wants to be gay or whatever he wants im happy if hes happy, what i won't do is bang on about it
What if they come to you, and tell you about the same-sex friend of your son or daughter, they say their friend is in love with them? Do you tell them such a thing never happened? Or that it isn't allowed? Or do you tell your child to go and ask their teacher because you can' deal with it?
Or if they tell you Nicholas at school now wants to be called Nicola. Do you tell your children that the other person's preference for how they want to be addressed, doesn't actually exist?
Do you only ever teach your children about the church's view of a nuclear family, Mommy, Daddy and the children.
 
Does anyone else just Scroll bast Billy's posts? They a so long winded and boring.
Im not sure hes is real. At least we know Nosey is for real.
I've told you before you're not obligated to read them, just continue what you're doing, and stop moaning about not reading my comments. :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
I've told you before you're not obligated to read them, just continue what you're:rolleyes: doing, and stop moaning about not reading my comments.
If its short and to the point, Ill read it. Anything past 3 lines bores me.and there's a grat likelihood that Ive heard it all before.
 
That is not true.

However, attempts are being made to prevent people who are not women or girls, from accessing places and events that are reserved exclusively to women and girls.
And in doing so the legislation is making no provision for intersex people, nor for those incorreclyl allocated a sex at birth.
The legislation and those activists want to legislate intersex people out of existence.

For example, women's changing rooms, women's communal showers, women's toilets, women's prisons, and women's weightlifting competitions.
What provision is there for intersex people to be safe, if the legislation denies they exist?

A man who calls himself a woman is not a woman, and is therefore not entitled to enter.
A man who wished to change her gender to female can call herself a woman.
As you refuse to provide any answer at all to Morqthana's request, (below) my statement needs no criteria produced to enable anyone who wants to call themselves a woman.
What characteristics does a person have to have to be classed as a "woman"?

You are having great difficulty with those facts.
It's not me that refuses to provide any criteria that classes a woman as woman.
It's you that keeps repeating the same meaningless mantra.
Are you repeating the same meaningless mantra to fall into some calm state without engaging in active thought or analysis of the mantra's definition?
A "meaningless" mantra is a, syllable, word, or phrase used in meditation—notably Transcendental Meditation—that lacks specific literal, intellectual, or logical meaning. These sounds are designed to allow the mind to settle into a quiet, calm state without engaging in active thought or analysis of the mantra's definition.
 
If its short and to the point, Ill read it. Anything past 3 lines bores me.and there's a grat likelihood that Ive heard it all before.
So it's some sort of attention deficiency you have.
That's not my problem. Shall I add some emojis to amuse you while you read?
 
This thread is about toilets and changing rooms being restricted to those people eligible to enter.
So what provision does the legislation make for non-binary people?

It is not about homosexuality or any other sexual orientation or preference. Nor is it about religion.
Your belief has no scientific justification. Therefore it can only be based solely on your religious belief which is contradictory to scientific fact.

Attempts to divert the topic and introduce irrelevant matter are just intended to muddy the waters and obscure a very simple point.
Because you've been backed into a corner of your own choosing, you're looking for some escape.

You could at least comply with morqthana's request and provide, in your opinion, what characteristics does a person need to have to be classed as a woman.
Let's start with what you think is the definition of "woman". What characteristics does a person have to have to be classed as a "woman"?

So if you say "being a woman is binary" then it really is down to you to show that that is true.
 
Back
Top