Toilets and changing rooms

[Highway Man]

All that appeared on my screen was a little picture. Was there a secret message in there somewhere that only you could find?

If there was, please write it out in plain English: What characteristics are required to determine a woman is a woman.

You replied to my answer and I blew you out of the water again with it so stop pretending that you didn't see the answer, there was no arguing with what I wrote and you had nothing but personal insults after that knowing you couldnt argue my points

 

[MNW67]

and I blew you out of the water

Oh, is that what it means. It hadn't really clicked.

 

[Highway Man]

Oh, is that what it means. It hadn't really clicked.

Think on....

 

[MNW67]

Think on....

You've taught me so much.

 

[King Billy]

It is a complex theological point. What is your explanation.

JohnD seems to be arguing that the Bible, in its entirety, is not the teaching of Christ. I want him to express his view rather than to make vague suggestions about what he believes on that issue, to limit his his criticisms of my comments without declaring his own ideology. I would consider that as trolling.

He can answer a simple question, if he prefers, "is the Bible, in its entirety, considered by Christians, or by him specifically, to be the teachings of Christ?
A simple yes or no would determine his position relevant to his criticism of my reference to Genesis.
Or, as is his usual behaviour, to make unfounded, vague and unfocussed criticisms of other philosophical concepts.

 

[MNW67]

JohnD seems to be arguing that the Bible, in its entirety, is not the teaching of Christ. I want him to express his view rather than to make vague suggestions about what he believes on that issue, to limit his his criticisms of my comments without declaring his own ideology. I would consider that as trolling.

He can answer a simple question, if he prefers, "is the Bible, in its entirety, considered by Christians, or by him specifically, to be the teachings of Christ?
A simple yes or no would determine his position relevant to his criticism of my reference to Genesis.
Or, as is his usual behaviour, to make unfounded, vague and unfocussed criticisms of other philosophical concepts.

In the beginning was the Word, the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

 

[King Billy]

You replied to my answer and I blew you out of the water again with it so stop pretending that you didn't see the answer, there was no arguing with what I wrote and you had nothing but personal insults after that knowing you couldnt argue my points

I asked you if a person who is menopausal, or has had a hysterectomy can still be considered a woman.
According to your definition, they can't.

You responded with a little picture.
I think, in an intelligent debate, little pictures don't really cut it.

You think that little pictures instead of literal arguments should prevail.
OK, now we know what age group we are dealing with.

 

[King Billy]

In the beginning was the Word, the Word was with God, and the Word was God.

And then God made man, and then woman. He didn't make any intersex people. (well, as there were only two people, the odds were very much weighted in his favour). What would the world be like now if one of them were intersex?
Therefore, according to Christian religion, intersex people don't, or cannot, exist.
But they do.
Was God wrong? Did he make a mistake?

 

[Highway Man]

You've taught me so much.

Exactly.. Its what I am here for.. Think on..

 

[MNW67]

And then God made man, and then woman. He didn't make any intersex people. (well, as there were only two people, the odds were very much weighted in his favour). What would the world be like now if one of them were intersex?
Therefore, according to Christian religion, intersex people don't, or cannot, exist.
But they do.
Was God wrong? Did he make a mistake?

I have no idea. I was just joining in the discussion about whether Christians believe that Genesis was the teaching of Christ.

 

[Highway Man]

I asked you if a person who is menopausal, or has had a hysterectomy can still be considered a woman.
According to your definition, they can't.

You responded with a little picture.
I think, in an intelligent debate, little pictures don't really cut it.

You think that little pictures instead of literal arguments should prevail.
OK, now we know what age group we are dealing with.

I made it very simple for you to understand, a bit like one of your comics that you read so you can thank me for that.

 

[pete01]

Please allow me to summarise your collective arguments, in a nutshell for those with attention deficiency problems:
"Anyone who holds a different opinion from you, (meaning Pete, HWM, MBK, JohnD, et al) are loonies, dummies, or mental, or live in a mental institution, or should be subjected to violence, because we have different opinions?"

Is it fair to assume that you are all well educated? Or is that a step too far?

Ive got a C in gcse science and and nvq level 3 does that count?

Im not Oxford/Cambridge educated like you lot but what I lack in education I make up for in pure common sense

 

[pete01]

Ive got a C in gcse science and and nvq level 3 does that count?

Im not Oxford/Cambridge educated like you lot but what I lack in education I make up for in pure common sense

As a side note I used to say "should of" until nosall and notch called me a flipping idiot now I say "should have" I like their teaching methods

 

[JohnD]

It's curious that Billy seeks to tell us what (he thinks) Christians believe, without any reference to Christ's teachings. He seems to think that documents written before Christ was born were written by Christ. Which is clearly absurd.

I see no reason to pay any attention to his confused ramblings on the subject of religion.

To be fair, his opinions on why people who are not women "should" be allowed into spaces and events reserved exclusively for women do not hold water either.

 

[JohnD]

"Anyone who holds a different opinion from you, (meaning Pete, HWM, MBK, JohnD, et al) are loonies, dummies, or mental, or live in a mental institution, or should be subjected to violence, because we have different opinions?"

Curious that Billy feels entitled to assert that a group of people he disagrees with (including me) holds these views.

Perhaps he is getting carried away.

He has not yet come up with a good reason why people who are not women should be allowed into spaces and events reserved exclusively for women.

Which, actually, is the point at issue.