Hi, I am replacing 2 floors (ground) in a property which was built in 1896.
I have removed both floors, one was a timber one with the floorboards laid on loose joists which in turn were laid on bricks directly on the earth.
The other floor was quarry tiles laid directly onto the earth.
I initially was going to concrete both rooms (adjoining) but recently thought it would be better to board it because I still have to install new electrics, gas and water plumbing etc underneath and I could leave the boards loose until all the services are in.
So, what are the pros and cons ?
I know about insulation and ventilation, and I will have to inform building control, but would like some opinions or does it come down to costs ?
Oh, if I go for a timber floor I will have to build a ’honeycomb’ wall and will have a lot more digging out to do.
thanks
I have removed both floors, one was a timber one with the floorboards laid on loose joists which in turn were laid on bricks directly on the earth.
The other floor was quarry tiles laid directly onto the earth.
I initially was going to concrete both rooms (adjoining) but recently thought it would be better to board it because I still have to install new electrics, gas and water plumbing etc underneath and I could leave the boards loose until all the services are in.
So, what are the pros and cons ?
I know about insulation and ventilation, and I will have to inform building control, but would like some opinions or does it come down to costs ?
Oh, if I go for a timber floor I will have to build a ’honeycomb’ wall and will have a lot more digging out to do.
thanks