Haven't used PTFE for years, usually Rapid Blue sealant or sometimes Loctite 55.
I see a number of issues with your suggestion...
•. Chrome pipe can't be welded, and Chrome plating would be damaged by the heat of the welding process if your stub was half & half. You'd need to weld in a steel stub then somehow chrome plate it afterwards, which would be difficult and expensive.
• Similarly, it would be a pain for manufacturers in the radiator painting process. If they chrome plated the tails before painting the radiators, they'd have to mask the chrome which is an extra process, increasing costs. If they plated after painting, they'd need to mask the stub, paint the radiator, clean overspray off the stub, and protect the paint during the plating process.
•. Having stubs sticking out the ends of the radiators creates packaging issues as they would need to be protected from damage. The whole package for each radiator would need to be longer, using more materials that would entirely negate any saving made by no longer needing to seal with PTFE
•. It would prevent ¾" union type radiator valves being used. I regularly use these valves types on heat pump installs as they can provide a higher flow rate and less noise than 15mm valves. Heat pumps run at a much higher flow rate than boiler systems
•. It would be annoying on replacement installations where a slightly longer radiator is being replaced with a standard size. For example, a 45" long (1143mm) radiator being replaced with an 1100mm radiator. With current radiators we'd use extension tails to make up the 21mm difference at either end. With your fixed stub idea this wouldn't be possible.
Probably other reasons too but there's 5 good ones as to why this idea will never work. Sorry to pee on your bonfire.
I see a number of issues with your suggestion...
•. Chrome pipe can't be welded, and Chrome plating would be damaged by the heat of the welding process if your stub was half & half. You'd need to weld in a steel stub then somehow chrome plate it afterwards, which would be difficult and expensive.
• Similarly, it would be a pain for manufacturers in the radiator painting process. If they chrome plated the tails before painting the radiators, they'd have to mask the chrome which is an extra process, increasing costs. If they plated after painting, they'd need to mask the stub, paint the radiator, clean overspray off the stub, and protect the paint during the plating process.
•. Having stubs sticking out the ends of the radiators creates packaging issues as they would need to be protected from damage. The whole package for each radiator would need to be longer, using more materials that would entirely negate any saving made by no longer needing to seal with PTFE
•. It would prevent ¾" union type radiator valves being used. I regularly use these valves types on heat pump installs as they can provide a higher flow rate and less noise than 15mm valves. Heat pumps run at a much higher flow rate than boiler systems
•. It would be annoying on replacement installations where a slightly longer radiator is being replaced with a standard size. For example, a 45" long (1143mm) radiator being replaced with an 1100mm radiator. With current radiators we'd use extension tails to make up the 21mm difference at either end. With your fixed stub idea this wouldn't be possible.
Probably other reasons too but there's 5 good ones as to why this idea will never work. Sorry to pee on your bonfire.

