I think you’re trying to make this dictionary definition about a socially complex word into an argument, and it’s not going to work the way you think it will.
Dictionaries are these man-made documents that are supposed to somehow be an authority on how we speak and write, but that is practically impossible!
No document could possibly capture the variations and nuances of a language.
People seem to view dictionaries as being objective, like they don’t have a stake in what they’re describing, but that isn’t the case.
Dictionaries express a point of view, an opinion, nothing more. People insist on pointing to dictionary definitions in arguments, but they don’t consider whose opinion they’re pointing to!
Dictionaries as books describing language are historically prescriptive – that means they were meant to tell people how they should speak.
The prescriptivist vs. descriptivist divide continues to this day, and most modern dictionaries for mass audiences try to straddle the two camps.
So the language in dictionaries tends to reflect the opinions of white, straight, academic men on what is acceptable English language, including the exclusion and denigration of different dialects and usages.