Well clearly the moderators think that the OP needs this argument, and that it's in his and the forum's interest for him to be told that advice that he's given by me is unsound, not because of what I wrote but purely because it was I that wrote it.
For some time now a bunch of fools, including you, have been deciding every now and then to criticise me, and each and every time when I say "OK then, if you believe that's a valid criticism please explain why, to you, it is logical and reasonable" these people fail to do so.
In other words, they are making critical posts that they cannot even justify to themselves. They are making them with absolutely no basis, even in their own minds, on what I've written.
Why these people think that what the forum needs are personal attacks, often triggered by their own febrile imaginations, rather than proper discussions of topics raised I have no idea, but over and over again they demonstrate irrational behaviour so maybe they aren't thinking at all. Usually I'm happy enough to make it clear that they're behaving like tw@s and move on, but in this case Steve has gone too far.
The OP is planning to rewire a house which has been derelict for years, and Steve sought to dismiss what I wrote just because he's decided to invent an ulterior for my writing it, not because he can provide any cogent arguments challenging the validity of any of it. This property, more likely than not, will require major gutting and renewal work with a from-scratch completely new electrical installation.
Does Steve really believe that someone doing that doesn't have to know how to design circuits?
Does he really believe that the OP doesn't have to know what type of supply he'll have and what the implications of that type might be?
Does he really believe that the OP doesn't have to know what's safe and what isn't?
Does he really believe that the OP doesn't have to understand how the way in which cables are installed affects how much current they can carry?
Does he really believe that the OP doesn't have to know about the rules concerning cables concealed in walls, partitions and under floors or run outside?
Does he really believe that the OP doesn't have to know how to join cables properly?
Does he really believe that the OP doesn't have to know about extraneous conductive parts and bonding?
Does he really believe that the OP doesn't have to know which circuits should be RCD protected?
Does he really believe that the OP doesn't have to know anything about testing?
If he does then I'd be interested to see him produce a point by point explanation of why someone embarking on a complete rewire doesn't need to know those things.
And if he doesn't believe that the OP doesn't have to know any of those things I'd be interested to see him explain why he thought it was a good idea to raise doubts in the OP's mind about the validity of what I wrote.