Thatcher Dead

Status
Not open for further replies.
As anyone who has been in/and still is in business knows - you can make as much stuff as you like --just as long as you can keep the stuff moving asap.

Without a good sales force- the chickens can lay eggs 3 times a day and the business will go to the wall--unless the eggs are sold before they are laid .

Of course - all the Hens think they are the most important factor in a business :lol: and the hens are always hungry for more food.
But- as businessman know -= hens are 2 a penny-- even if they are fed several times a day --they will just keep taking the food and getting fatter and lazier .

Sales are paramount .
hens are expendable and easily replaced.

Give them a inch and they WANT a mile .
NO such thing as loyalty for hens .

That's a pretty good analogy but both are dependant on each others success.
 
ajstoneservices";p="2740917 said:
As anyone who has been in/and still is in business knows - you can make as much stuff as you like --just as long as you can keep the stuff moving asap.

Without a good sales force- the chickens can lay eggs 3 times a day and the business will go to the wall--unless the eggs are sold before they are laid .

Of course - all the Hens think they are the most important factor in a business :lol: and the hens are always hungry for more food.
But- as businessman know -= hens are 2 a penny-- even if they are fed several times a day --they will just keep taking the food and getting fatter and lazier .

Sales are paramount .
hens are expendable and easily replaced.

Give them a inch and they WANT a mile .
NO such thing as loyalty for hens .

That's a pretty good analogy but both are dependant on each others success.[/quote

True .
 
Don't forget that if it hadn't been for Maggie, we'd all be living in the Socialist Republic of Britain. Everyone would be working for state-owned organisations, there would be no competition between companies and so they'd be at liberty to increase their prices as much as they like, we'd all be living in council houses (in the name of equality) and, perhaps worst of all, we'd all look exactly the same as each other - just like the North Koreans!

And we'd all be running after President Scargill cheering and applauding him in fear of our lives!
 
Don't forget that if it hadn't been for Maggie, we'd all be living in the Socialist Republic of Britain.

you are fantasising a "might have been" and have convinced yourself it is a "would have been"

There are many Western European countries, but they did not have a Thatcher, and are not ruled by a Scargill.

Despite their lack of a Thatcher, they are all more prosperous than in 1979. So it cannot be claimed that a European country without a Thatcher is a poor and undemocratic country.

Perhaps you have allowed your judgement to be warped.
 
Woldn't go that far but I definately liked her.
Just talking too a very wealthy ole farmer today and he said he loved her citing she only put the food in her basket within the limit of what she could afford.
Way to go eh?

Not many farmers would dislike her....massively subsidised by Thatcher, shed didnt have a personal vendetta against them, unlike other industries.

No. Massively subsidised by the eu. Get your facts right!

No, massively subsidised by Thatcher before she got the rebate from Common agricultural policy, get your facts right!

Nope.
Google wrote
The UK received relatively little money from the CAP, because of its smaller agricultural sector. As a result, in 1984, Margaret Thatcher secured a substantial rebate for the UK on its EU budget contribution.


If you have evidence that farmers were massively subsidised by Thatcher before or after the rebate then post up the evidence or STFU.
The rebate today is worth 4 billion euro. Another victory for the Baroness and the UK as a whole not recognised by the lefties.


The leftie socialist haters hate Margaret Thatcher because she reminds them they are wrong about everything.

Google wrote
Throughout the Sixties and Seventies, this country had been outperformed by every European economy. ‘Britain is a tragedy — it has sunk to borrowing, begging, stealing until North Sea oil comes in,’ said Henry Kissinger.
All hail Thatcherism.

Little Thatcher boy here needs to do more research on his heroinne!!!!

You almost quoted exactly what I said, and I didnt need google to do that.

They recieved hardly any money so where subsidised by the government untill Thatcher went and got the UK Rebate. The only industry she never damaged! So unless you can prove otherwise, I suggest you STFU?

Roll on party time on Wednesday!!!!
 
Except you got it wrong arzehole.
You claim farmers loved the Baroness because she subsidized then heavily.
We noticed no change on our farm subsidies during the labour or thatcher era's. It was set by the CAP.

Post up the evidence or stfu. (He won't) :lol:
 
Don't forget that if it hadn't been for Maggie, we'd all be living in the Socialist Republic of Britain.

you are fantasising a "might have been" and have convinced yourself it is a "would have been"

There are many Western European countries, but they did not have a Thatcher, and are not ruled by a Scargill.

Despite their lack of a Thatcher, they are all more prosperous than in 1979. So it cannot be claimed that a European country without a Thatcher is a poor and undemocratic country.

Perhaps you have allowed your judgement to be warped.

Perhaps you're right. Then again, did these other countries have trades unions who wished to rule the country?
 
Most of them had much better industrial relations, and the most successful brings the unions in as a partner to the success of the business.

A combative style is not helpful.

Economic policies which cause the collapse of industry and add literally millions to the tally of unemployed are never going to improve things.
 
A combative style is not helpful

I find it helps a lot. Especially when you've got lazy barstewards for workers. :lol:

Economic policies which cause the collapse of industry and add literally millions to the tally of unemployed are never going to improve things

If a business is being subsidised by the tax payer then the best option is cut off its life blood. If it can't stand on its own two feet after that then it doesn't deserve too.
 
I find it helps a lot. Especially when you've got lazy barstewards for workers. :lol:

if you are an employer or manager with poor industrial relations and a demoralised workforce, some of us can guess where the cause of the problem lies.

You have been bragging about your incompetence, but it may be that you are not telling the truth.

If you had been running a company with modest gearing, and the interest rate increased to 17%, your business would probably collapse too.
 
You have been bragging about your incompetence

Where?
First I'd need to be incompetent. And secondly I'd need to be a manager or employer of a workforce. You don't have to be the boss to chase workers off the site. :lol:
You do post some bullshYte JD.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top