I think Jim's wife also threw a brick at his head...
I see you've reverted to type and just being abusive.Any supportive evidence?
No, as usual, none.Just a silly attempt at being abusive again.
Is this your job description?
http://www.prospects.ac.uk/equality_and_diversity_officer_job_description.htm[/QUOTE]That would explain a lot!
You're really very nasty despite your claims to the opposite.
But that's what one expects from a hypochritical person.
Dopey comment from a dopey person as usual.I think I must have been a Trappist Monk or something in a previous life. I will step to avoid an insect on a pavement if I see it.
I’ve got a big problem with pigeons swooping down on my garden and wolfing down all the grub I put out for the Blue Tiits, Sparrows, Dunnocks etc. One thing I know is Pigeons have superb eyesight. Even from inside my front room I only have to wave an arm and they fly off; leaving the smaller birds thinking “What’s the pigeon’s problem?”.
So no, I don’t buy that anyone has to throw a single thing to shoo a pigeon off.
Hec, from Bulls to pigeons. What next, Seahorses
I agree. Have a couple of pigeons in the garden also.
Never been a problem.
I suspect coathangers pigeon crapped over him and he just took spite against the creature.
You obviously haven't even read the link because if you had you would have realised that I wasn't even there.
You're becoming more of a plonker with each comment that you make.
The thread was started by Bacho who showed a caring nature towards an injured pigeon.
Then you troll the thread with your "brick bashing" post presumably to initiate a response.
Like I said. You're a sick puppy!
Yeah, he kept it alive for a few days (with a radio playing) in his shed, then he took it to the vet for it to be dispatched. 
You've made that mistake before.So I was right. You were just using your apparent concern for animals as an exploitation for racial abuse.
.
You are an overt racist, suffering from islamophobia..
Allowing for the fact that you are obviously not very bright, I will give you a valuable piece of advice.
When you want to criticise people, you need to make absolutely sure that you have all of your facts straight. To help you in this, you need to get into your confused head that islam is not a race.
I accused you of racial abuse and that includes religious abuse.
So before you go giving advice you ought to check your facts.
Oh I forgot, you don't do "checking facts before making silly comments" do you.
I'll look up the previous proof that racial prejudice can include religious prejudice.
Because it's irrelevant and none of you business.You'll suspect whatever someone suggests, whether it is the truth or not, you'll never have the intelligence to realise that you're believing whatever you want to.I don't need a disclaimer if I choose not to reveal who my employer is or my vocation. You, or cajar only discovered it by some serious and time-consuming searching. You lot must be obsessed with my private life.
By your previous reasoning, by stating who your rmployer is you can give more credence to your opinions.
I chose not to do so.
You did, and you then needed a disclaimer.
I have done a fair bit of teaching, children and adults, and in some specialist subjects.It's also dispelled my thoughts that you may be running an evening class somewhere in trolling.
I won't.He'll say it wasn't him but his wife NorconCan he be guilty by association?
I choose not to disclose many things about me, as you do, but it has no significance or relevance, in my opinion.
My opinions and reasoning stands alone without any alignment, support, approval or qualification from any organistaion.
If you perceive that as somehow being less worthy opinion, I disagree.
You've just declared your self a land owner a few posts back.
How many acres do you own? Is it a secret?
Or is it as I suspect a "lie"?
No one has suggested its a lie so far.
Is it?
How many hectares? Why such a big secret?
I thought you had me on ignore.
Oh, yes you were telling porkies.
Why am I not surprised.
You've done your usual trick of assuming that someone else's assertion is reality, without checking for yourself. That's where you're going wrong.
No. You offered your details for your advantage. I sought to put right that which you were implying, which was wrong, i.e. that your opinion was the same as that of your employer.
Don't they have e-mail where you are?
He's coming over in a couple of weeks time for Le Mans. So we've been in regular contact anyway.Oh, I know. He’s a mate who you talk with all the time and just dropped that in eh? And enough pointing at stuff for him to get an opinion of a DIYnot forum in GD eh? .
Be my guest. You do not know which LA I worked at so you'll have as much trawling through past records as cajar had, if you're so obsessed.
Now your credibility has gone and you've resorted to abuse.
