balls

"Yes I did"

No you didn't. Epic fail.

"I can do better than using smoke and mirrors for definitions"

Smoke and mirrors is all you can provide.
Do stop playing the clown, norcon. Although you're a natural, it does you no favours.
 
"Yes I did"

No you didn't. Epic fail.

"I can do better than using smoke and mirrors for definitions"

Smoke and mirrors is all you can provide.
Do stop playing the clown, norcon. Although you're a natural, it does you no favours.

Clowns are clever. Just look at Stan Laurel.
Still waiting for an explanation.

Lets face it.. to explain nonsense you'll have to write more nonsense.
:lol: :lol:
 
Can you explain it? (he won't)
:lol: :lol:
Stick to clowning 'cos your impressions are not so good.

It's pointless trying to discuss anything with you norcon 'cos your responses border on the imbecillic.

A typical example of a member of the hyponoia gang. :roll: :roll:
 
Your arguments are only fit for the dustbin. :lol: :lol:
So don't read them then.
That's fine by me. :lol: :lol:
I suppose you'll be announcing to the world and his wife that you're putting me on ignore. Pathetic!
Please do, then I won't have to suffer your imbecillic responses.
 
Your arguments are only fit for the dustbin. :lol: :lol:
So don't read them then.
That's fine by me. :lol: :lol:
I suppose you'll be announcing to the world and his wife that you're putting me on ignore. Pathetic!
Please do, then I won't have to suffer your imbecillic responses.

I'd never put the court jester on ignore.
:lol:

At least I'm satisfied now your all huff and no puff. :wink:
 
I'd never put the court jester on ignore.
:lol:
Because you think they'e clever.
OK, I can accept that.
Now please try to explain why you think it's nonsense to equate racism with radical fundamentalism.
This is the fourth time, at least, that I'm asking.

Without the pathetic derogatory comments.
 
I'd never put the court jester on ignore.
:lol:
Because you think they'e clever.
OK, I can accept that.
Now please try to explain why you think it's nonsense to equate racism with radical fundamentalism.

Without the pathetic derogatory comments.
If you can. :roll:

Can you point to where you equated racism with radical fundamentalism?
I'm not seeing it.

Can you explain this nonsense..
"I object to all kinds of radical fundamentalists, and that includes racism!"

(He won't)
 
Can you point to where you equated racism with radical fundamentalism?
I'm not seeing it.
I object to all kinds of radical fundamentalists, and that includes racism!
About two pages ago. But you knew that because you've reproduced it yourself. You're amazing, norcon.
I never realised how anyone can be so stupid.
Can you explain this nonsense..
"I object to all kinds of radical fundamentalists, and that includes racism!"

(He won't)
So please explain why you think it was nonsense.
Skip the impressions.
 
Can you point to where you equated racism with radical fundamentalism?
I'm not seeing it.
I object to all kinds of radical fundamentalists, and that includes racism!
About two pages ago. But you knew that because you've reproduced it yourself. You're amazing, norcon.
I never realised how anyone can be so stupid.
Can you explain this nonsense..
"I object to all kinds of radical fundamentalists, and that includes racism!"

(He won't)
So please explain why you think it was nonsense.
Skip the impressions.

Can you explain this nonsense....
"I object to all kinds of radical fundamentalists, and that includes racism!"

(He won't) Changing the terminology is not an option. (laff out loud)

Edit.
reindeer has shrivveled off now and refuses to give an answer.
 
You probably wish I'd shrivveled(sic) off, but unlike some (no names) I prefer a considered response. :roll:
Can you explain this nonsense....
"I object to all kinds of radical fundamentalists, and that includes racism!"

(He won't)
Sure, when you provide a critique of my statement, as requested several times, I’ll respond.
These are the requests for your critique:
Page 6
What a load of hogwash.
Were there any particular bits that you disagreed with, or did you disagree with it all? :roll:
Page 6 again.
Please explain how or why you think it's nonsense, rather than just a bland rebuttal.
Page 6 again
Can you explain why you think it's nonsense? You couldn't manage anymore than a few lines, but an attempt would be appreciated.
Page 6 again
You've yet to explain why you think its's nonsense. I've now asked about three times for a reasoned response and all I've had is "It's nonsense" from you.
Do try to excel yourself this time. :roll: :roll:
Page 7
Now please try to explain why you think it's nonsense to equate racism with radical fundamentalism.
This is the fourth time, at least, that I'm asking.
Page 7 again
So please explain why you think it was nonsense.
Your reference to changing terminology is baffling, please explain.
Oh no! here we go with another load of imbecillic comments.

I realise I'm wasting my time, so just respond with your typical nonsensical comments.
 
Sorry, norcon. I'd love to continue this intellectual discussion with you :lol: :lol:
but I have to take my leave of you now, along with your intellectual ability..
 
Back
Top