balls

[RNReindeer]

Why is it racist or Neanderthal (according to the apologist faction on here) to report what's going on in the news? Are the media themselves racist Neanderthals for reporting it in the first place?

https://uk.news.yahoo.com/royal-pal...s-attack-fears-113516790.html#tPS0Ms4[/QUOTE]
If you can't tell the difference between factual news and racist vitriol, then there's no hope for you.

Perhaps I should edit this post and remove the first word.

 

[RNReindeer]

Because the 'conditioned ones' can't see any further than their own bubble. They tend to dedicate their lives fighting 'racism' where it doesn't exist but in fact create racism through their blinkered repetitive shyyte. And I am convinced that some on this forum actively condone terrorism.

Racism doesn't exist. Which planet are you on?

We create racism by objecting to it.
Have you taken complete leave of your senses?

It's like me suggesting that cruelty to animals doesn't exist until you object to it. Plonker!

You should be convinced that some on this forum actively condone, even promote violence. Norcon for example:

reindeer has resorted to insulting the Neanderthals now. In a survival situation they would out wit him easily.

Like just club him over the head and eat him.

or Whitespiit:

Just remember deery - watch your back. You may be next on the list. What poetic justice that would be.

The hyponoia gang are the "conditioned ones", conditioned, even radicalised, into racial and other prejudices by their parents.
It's so endemic in their view of the world that they're unaware of it.

 

[RNReindeer]

Defintely a bit bizarre when they demonise the messengers rather than the perpetrators of these crimes that are widely reported. I suppose some don't want to admit that the wheels are slowly but surely coming off their dangerous social experiments.

Elly always seemed to condone, but since his toys were propelled from the pram, he seems to have disappeared: or sought treatment.

Resorting to misrepresenting people's views does you no favours. It does demonstrate your desperation.

 

[Johnmelad]

None so blind as those who will not see.

 

[RNReindeer]

You've resorted to regurgitating old photographs that have been posted several times before, and discussed several times before.
Now at least you've been honest enought to demonstrate your true intention. It didn't take long to expose you.
Will you now accept that you posted about halal slaughter merely as a provocation of racially abusing muslims?

Your intention is perfectly clear to me:

Being tolerant to the intolerant should not be tolerated.

You want to excacerbate the situation.
You're not just a racist, you're a dangerous racially abusive lunatic.

 

[Brigadier]

Because the 'conditioned ones' can't see any further than their own bubble. They tend to dedicate their lives fighting 'racism' where it doesn't exist but in fact create racism through their blinkered repetitive shyyte. And I am convinced that some on this forum actively condone terrorism.

Racism doesn't exist. Which planet are you on?

We create racism by objecting to it.
Have you taken complete leave of your senses?

Whitespirit66 wrote:
"Defintely a bit bizarre when they demonise the messengers rather than the perpetrators of these crimes that are widely reported. I suppose some don't want to admit that the wheels are slowly but surely coming off their dangerous social experiments.

Elly always seemed to condone, but since his toys were propelled from the pram, he seems to have disappeared: or sought treatment."

Resorting to misrepresenting people's views does you no favours. It does demonstrate your desperation. icon_lol.gif icon_lol.gif


Oh, the irony

That, or DC can't read.

 

[RNReindeer]

Because the 'conditioned ones' can't see any further than their own bubble. They tend to dedicate their lives fighting 'racism' where it doesn't exist but in fact create racism through their blinkered repetitive shyyte. And I am convinced that some on this forum actively condone terrorism.

Racism doesn't exist. Which planet are you on?

We create racism by objecting to it.
Have you taken complete leave of your senses?

Whitespirit66 wrote:
"Defintely a bit bizarre when they demonise the messengers rather than the perpetrators of these crimes that are widely reported. I suppose some don't want to admit that the wheels are slowly but surely coming off their dangerous social experiments.

Elly always seemed to condone, but since his toys were propelled from the pram, he seems to have disappeared: or sought treatment."

Resorting to misrepresenting people's views does you no favours. It does demonstrate your desperation. icon_lol.gif icon_lol.gif


Oh, the irony

That, or DC can't read.

Sorry brigadier, you're going to have to explain your thought processes, slowly so you can keep up, please.

Who's DC? Is this some other cryptic message?

 

[Johnmelad]

You've resorted to regurgitating old photographs that have been posted several times before, and discussed several times before.
Now at least you've been honest enought to demonstrate your true intention. It didn't take long to expose you.
Will you now accept that you posted about halal slaughter merely as a provocation of racially abusing muslims?

Your intention is perfectly clear to me:

Being tolerant to the intolerant should not be tolerated.

You want to excacerbate the situation.
You're not just a racist, you're a dangerous racially abusive lunatic.

Well done Sherlock, took you long enough to figure out I dislike the religion of hatred slaughter, subjugators of women, and child molesters.

 

[Johnmelad]

You've resorted to regurgitating old photographs that have been posted several times before, and discussed several times before.
Now at least you've been honest enought to demonstrate your true intention. It didn't take long to expose you.
Will you now accept that you posted about halal slaughter merely as a provocation of racially abusing muslims?

Your intention is perfectly clear to me:

Being tolerant to the intolerant should not be tolerated.

You want to excacerbate the situation.
You're not just a racist, you're a dangerous racially abusive lunatic.

And you are a seriously dangerous apologist for Islam and all that it stands for.

You've resorted to regurgitating old photographs that have been posted several times before, and discussed several times before.

Old photographs have somehow become irrelevant?

Is this one now irrelevant?

Naked Soviet POWs held by the Nazis in Mauthausen concentration camp. "... the murder of at least 3.3 million Soviet POWs is one of the least-known of modern genocides.

 

[JBR]

None so blind as those who will not see.

That second picture, "Islam will dominate the world", is perfectly correct and the sad thing is that they are being supported by some of the same people who will be the ones to suffer under this projected regime.

I believe that even some white women are RoP supporters!

 

[Norcon]

You've resorted to regurgitating old photographs that have been posted several times before, and discussed several times before.
Now at least you've been honest enought to demonstrate your true intention. It didn't take long to expose you.
Will you now accept that you posted about halal slaughter merely as a provocation of racially abusing muslims?

Your intention is perfectly clear to me:

Being tolerant to the intolerant should not be tolerated.

You want to excacerbate the situation.
You're not just a racist, you're a dangerous racially abusive lunatic.

And you are a seriously dangerous apologist for Islam and all that it stands for.

You've resorted to regurgitating old photographs that have been posted several times before, and discussed several times before.

Old photographs have somehow become irrelevant?

Is this one now irrelevant?

Naked Soviet POWs held by the Nazis in Mauthausen concentration camp. "... the murder of at least 3.3 million Soviet POWs is one of the least-known of modern genocides.

If reindeer took a trip out to Iraq he would see very similar images.
Christians being herded into mass graves and shot.

Leftards like reindeer won't criticise Islam because they use the same modus operandi.

Both claim to be a force for good, both claim to be peaceful and fair. Both play the victim card, both gain followers by claiming to be oppressed whilst issuing daily updates on who they're going to hate more today.
And both censor any kind of debate because true open and honest discourse will expose both parties as the hateful, violent ideologies that they really are.

 

[Newboy]

I don't think for one minute that anybody is defending the actions of a group of murderous b*astards - there are no words that could condemn the brutal murders carried out by these deranged lunatics.

But the view that you and a number of other posters keep on expressing is that all Muslims are evil is simply demonising 1.6 billion people based on the actions of a small minority of extremists.

Do you genuinely believe that all Muslims are evil?

 

[Johnmelad]

Do you genuinely believe that all Muslims are evil?

Do you believe Islam is not a backward evil religion?

 

[RNReindeer]

You're a sick little puppy, johnymelad, as are the rest of the hyponoia gang.
You're so deeply entrenched in your fanatical racist ideology that you can only see the two opposing views of either/or.
No doubt you were an ardent supporter of the Bush ideology "you're either for us or you're against us"

Sorry to disappoint you but the majority of reasonable people have a plurality approach, allowing multiple views or opposing multiple fanatical actions.

In case this comes as an epiphanic moment for you, the majority of reasonable people vehemently oppose your fanatical racist ideology, and vehemently oppose terorism in all its forms.

You've demonstrated how sick you are by camouflaging your racist hatred under the guise of animal welfare. You adopt a photo of Lee Rigby and associate it with your racist propoganda without a thought to the distress you may cause his family.
Now you're adopting photographs of war victims in your sick little game of "if you're not a racist, then you must be a terrorist".

I object to all kinds of radical fundamentalists, and that includes racism!

To address your ludicrous accusation against Islam:
No religion per se is evil. Only the sick practitioners of violence under the guise of religion are evil. Rather like your pretence of animal welfare to persue your hidden agenda of racism. Fanatics of all sorts adopt guises to practice and preach their version of violent confrontation.

It's like the argument that guns kill people, but other say guns don't kill, people use guns to kill.
Religion per se doesn't harm people. But sadly, there are sick people, of all colours and creeds who adopt the guise of religion to perpetrate their radical fundamentalism, and, just as you are, try to recruit more sick people to their cause, under whatever camouflage suits their purpose.

By the same token their are billions of reasonable people who believe and practise religion in all the charitable and hospitable ways it was intended.

 

[Norcon]

You're a sick little puppy, johnymelad, as are the rest of the hyponoia gang.
You're so deeply entrenched in your fanatical racist ideology that you can only see the two opposing views of either/or.
No doubt you were an ardent supporter of the Bush ideology "you're either for us or you're against us"

Sorry to disappoint you but the majority of reasonable people have a plurality approach, allowing multiple views or opposing multiple fanatical actions.

In case this comes as an epiphanic moment for you, the majority of reasonable people vehemently oppose your fanatical racist ideology, and vehemently oppose terorism in all its forms.

You've demonstrated how sick you are by camouflaging your racist hatred under the guise of animal welfare. You adopt a photo of Lee Rigby and associate it with your racist propoganda without a thought to the distress you may cause his family.
Now you're adopting photographs of war victims in your sick little game of "if you're not a racist, then you must be a terrorist".

I object to all kinds of radical fundamentalists, and that includes racism!

To address your ludicrous accusation against Islam:
No religion per se is evil. Only the sick practitioners of violence under the guise of religion are evil. Rather like your pretence of animal welfare to persue your hidden agenda of racism. Fanatics of all sorts adopt guises to practice and preach their version of violent confrontation.

It's like the argument that guns kill people, but other say guns don't kill, people use guns to kill.
Religion per se doesn't harm people. But sadly, there are sick people, of all colours and creeds who adopt the guise of religion to perpetrate their radical fundamentalism, and, just as you are, try to recruit more sick people to their cause, under whatever camouflage suits their purpose.

By the same token their are billions of reasonable people who believe and practise religion in all the charitable and hospitable ways it was intended.

What a load of hogwash.