balls

I'm afraid it's going to take more than that. Eg. in France, they have put 1,000 soldiers on the streets because of 3 terrorist outrages in recent days - all in the name of The R O P.

http://www.thedailybeast.com/articl...s-wave-of-crazy-terror-christmas-attacks.html
Shall we take the time to analyse Whitespiits illogical ramblings in detail.
He says 1000 soldiers have been allocated. The article says:
that 300 extra troops have been added to the already extensive military and police presence in the cities where the attacks took place
Whitespirit says that three terrorist outrages in the name of Islam...etc.
The article says:
French President François Hollande is telling the French people they should “not lump them together.” Prime Minister Manuel Valls says that two of the three incidents were the work of deranged copycats, but don’t fit into a “classic terrorist logic.” And an adviser to the French government, speaking privately, tells The Daily Beast, “These are not lone wolves, they are crazy wolves.”

............/
On Sunday, in Dijon, the capital of Burgundy, ..... But Nacer’s bona fides as a madman are well established, and French officials focused on those: He reportedly had made 157 visits to psychiatric wards since 2001.

....../

On Monday, in Nantes, a 37-year-old loner with a history of psychological problems ripped up his well-tended little garden in a village nearby, .........., fatally injured one of the bystanders and hospitalized several others before taking a knife and plunging it into his own body several times without managing to finish himself off. He and four of his victims remain hospitalized. He did not shout “God is great,”

Yet despite the overwhelming evidence, idiots and bigots suich as Whitespirit, assocaite these outrages with Islam. :roll: :roll:

Wake up to the vitriolic diatribe spouted by the fundamentalists such as this nutter.
I know I go on, but what sort of world do we want to live in? How bad do we let it get before something has to be done?
 
In 2003, around a million people in the UK marched in protest against the invasion of Iraq.

Terrorists blow up skyscrapers, trains, themselves and attack civilians and/or off-duty unarmed soldiers, and a handful of UK Muslims might mumble quietly into their beards, then duck back below the parapet.

The OP's point was Amir Khan is one of the very few high profile Muslims to stand up and shout condemnation.

Of course I could be wrong...
Perhaps the Muslim newspapers and media is full of Imams screaming condemnation of these terrorist acts in voices that would put the late Ian Paisley to shame. Perhaps the non-radical Muslims are forever on the phone to the Police reporting the suspicious bloke around the corner who's just come back from somewhere in the middle east with a bunch of pamphlets and a dangerous glint in his eye. Perhaps the Muslim youths who berate 'Western' girls for immodest dress or who put up signs saying this part of the UK is now under Sharia law are taken to one side by their parents and/or elders and given a sound talking to.
I could be wrong...
 
In 2003, around a million people in the UK marched in protest against the invasion of Iraq.

Terrorists blow up skyscrapers, trains, themselves and attack civilians and/or off-duty unarmed soldiers,
Apart fom your comment about Amir Khan, the rest of your post is pure biggoted supposition.

and a handful of UK Muslims might mumble quietly into their beards, then duck back below the parapet.
Biggoted diatribe. How many mosques do you visit to witness the anti-radical message being preached. Yet you continue to preach your fundamentalist biggotry.

The OP's point was Amir Khan is one of the very few high profile Muslims to stand up and shout condemnation.
There have been so many high profile muslims speaking out against terrorism. This is probably the first one that the OP noticed.

Of course I could be wrong...
But you obviously will not genuinely consider the possibility. It's against your religion. :lol:
Perhaps the Muslim newspapers and media is full of Imams screaming condemnation of these terrorist acts in voices that would put the late Ian Paisley to shame.
This forum certainly has a few individuals screaming their racial hatred at the least opportunity.
Perhaps the non-radical Muslims are forever on the phone to the Police reporting the suspicious bloke around the corner who's just come back from somewhere in the middle east with a bunch of pamphlets and a dangerous glint in his eye.
How many of your friends are you aware of that are sexual predators?
You can bet your life on it that there are some but they don't wear labels. One Mother told the police about her son, who was subsequently imprisoned for 12 years.
Perhaps the Muslim youths who berate 'Western' girls for immodest dress or who put up signs saying this part of the UK is now under Sharia law are taken to one side by their parents and/or elders and given a sound talking to.
More radical prejudiced supposition. Spouted just for effect, without any real evidence.
I could be wrong...
No, you're not wrong, just indoctrinated into racial and religious prejudice but you'll never understand where it emanated from. Just like all typical radical fundamentlists.
You're no better or worse than the other types of religious zealots.
 
he's never been further than Western Super Mare),

Where the fook is 'Western Super Mare'?? :lol:

Muppet criticizing me for not being worldly wise, can't even spell a simple place name. :roll: :roll:

Same old garbage from the resident terrorists' apologist. I've seen plenty of the world in my youth to be confident of my world view thanks. You ought to try removing your libertard blinkers some time sunshine. :roll: :roll:
 
he's never been further than Western Super Mare),

Where the fook is 'Western Super Mare'?? :lol:

Muppet criticizing me for not being worldly wise, can't even spell a simple place name. :roll: :roll:
I guessed you were from a simple place. :lol: :lol:

Same old garbage from the resident radical racist. I've seen plenty of the world in my youth to be confident of my world view thanks. You ought to try removing your parental imbued prejudice sometime sunshine. :roll: :roll:

I'm surpised your hands manage to get near the keyboard to respond because you're so busy thwanking your fellow thwankers. :lol: :lol:
 
Shall we take the time to analyse Whitespiits illogical ramblings in detail.
He says 1000 soldiers have been allocated. The article says:
that 300 extra troops have been added to the already extensive military and police presence in the cities where the attacks took place

Shall I waste a minute of my life analysing deery's stupidity and total lack of any ability to comprehend written English.

300 troops are EXTRA to the other troops already deployed - numbering 700 - total = 1000

But don't take my word for it you hand-wringing oaf - it comes from the mouth of the French prime minister. To quote him in a Times article -

'Manuel Valls, the prime minister, urged the public to remain calm and said he had deployed up to 300 more soldiers to add to the 780 already on public duty, as fears grew of further copycat attacks.'

From here -

http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/world/europe/article4305955.ece

I would waste more of my time to destroy the rest of your pathetic argument, if I thought you could understand plain English. :roll: :roll:


Note to others on here - the attacks in France are not getting high level media coverage, as the authorities are anxious to try to cover up the full situation. The perpetrators/terrorists are being portrayed as mental cases rather than terrorists, once again to down-play the situation - but aren't all terrorists and their followers suffering from deranged minds?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97JRDSB97zk
 
Shall I waste a minute of my life analysing deery's stupidity and total lack of any ability to comprehend written English.

300 troops are EXTRA to the other troops already deployed - numbering 700 - total = 1000

But don't take my word for it you hand-wringing oaf - it comes from the mouth of the French prime minister. To quote him in a Times article -

'Manuel Valls, the prime minister, urged the public to remain calm and said he had deployed up to 300 more soldiers to add to the 780 already on public duty, as fears grew of further copycat attacks.'

From here -

http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/news/world/europe/article4305955.ece[/QUOTE]
Such a shame that you omitted this infomation in your first post. it made you look like a fantasist. Appropriately, probably.
I'm more than happy to spend a minute of my time analysing whitespirit's stupidity and total lack of any ability to comprehend written English. :lol:

I would waste more of my time to destroy the rest of your pathetic argument, if I thought you could understand plain English. :roll: :roll: but I can't! :shock:
Corrected that for you. :lol: :lol:

Here's my attempt to incite racial and religious intolerance:Note to others on here - the attacks in France are not getting high level media coverage, as the authorities are anxious to try to cover up the full situation. The perpetrators/terrorists are being portrayed as mental cases rather than terrorists, once again to down-play the situation - but aren't all terrorists and their followers suffering from deranged minds?
Corrected that for you as well.
Why didn't you tell us that you are more aware of the situation in France than the French government, press, etc?
Only whitespirit knows the real situation. He's the man that's going to save the country from terrorists.
What's that you say?
He is a wannabe terrorist? He's been radicalised and indoctrinated so far but he's not up to anything else yet. :lol: :lol:
 
I can laugh - but then I don't live in France. :lol: :lol:

Just remember deery - watch your back. You may be next on the list. What poetic justice that would be. :lol: :lol:
 
I've been wondering why the thwankers keep thwanking each other.
I've decided that they all belong to the same gang, the hyponoia gang.
The best they can manage is to thwank each other. :lol: :lol:
 
Of course I could be wrong...
Perhaps the Muslim newspapers and media is full of Imams screaming condemnation of these terrorist acts in voices that would put the late Ian Paisley to shame. Perhaps the non-radical Muslims are forever on the phone to the Police reporting the suspicious bloke around the corner who's just come back from somewhere in the middle east with a bunch of pamphlets and a dangerous glint in his eye. Perhaps the Muslim youths who berate 'Western' girls for immodest dress or who put up signs saying this part of the UK is now under Sharia law are taken to one side by their parents and/or elders and given a sound talking to.
I could be wrong...

No, I'm sure you're quite correct. Although I have never seen any of this in the press, I think that must be because the government has placed a D-notice on the report in order not to upset muslim terrorists.
 
..half a page of utter cobblers...
I did start to reply to this with supporting weblinks, then a mate I hadn't seen in six months knocked on the door and I realized I had more interesting things to do. Besides, any factual evidence in support of the opposing side of the argument would be discounted by you anyway as racist western propaganda. :roll:
 
Back
Top