Libertarian

[Whitespirit66]

Just wondering about the use of 'libertard' - is it meant to be a derogatory word for a libertarian? Or something else?

LIBER = LIBERal

TARD = ******

Basically, fcked up turkeys who vote for Christmas.

 

[JohnD]

It must be a term used by American rednecks, then.

 

[noseall]

I'd like to know what an apologist is?

It is a word only used as an insult to those who defend controversial subjects.

Ok then fair enough.

I defend or apologise for no one.

Can anyone of you quote me where I have condoned the behavior of or apologised on behalf of or defended any of the (reprehensible) people in recent subjects?

I'm only here to restore parity and show what a lop-sided and blinkered view the racists have.

 

[handyjack]

I'd like to know what an apologist is?

It is a word only used as an insult to those who defend controversial subjects.

Ok then fair enough.

I defend or apologise for no one.

Can anyone of you quote me where I have condoned the behavior of or apologised on behalf of or defended any of the (reprehensible) people in recent subjects?

I'm only here to restore parity and show what a lop-sided and blinkered view the racists have.

 

[Micilin]

Just wondering about the use of 'libertard' - is it meant to be a derogatory word for a libertarian? Or something else?

LIBER = LIBERal

TARD = ******

Basically, fcked up turkeys who vote for Christmas.

Having made the obligatory trip to Wikipedia , then-

Liberal in the sense of believing in:

Free trade, free press, democratic elections, freedom of religion,private property, limited government and all being treated equally before the law?

 

[Dextraneous]

I'm only here to restore parity and show what a lop-sided and blinkered view the racists have.

Laudable intentions indeed. The trouble is in the fighting of fire with fire

 

[RNReindeer]

I'm only here to restore parity and show what a lop-sided and blinkered view the racists have.

Laudable intentions indeed. The trouble is in the fighting of fire with fire

Occasionally necessary and when it is, it's very effective, e.g. fire breaks to prevent further conflagration of forest fires.

 

[noseall]

I'm only here to restore parity and show what a lop-sided and blinkered view the racists have.

Laudable intentions indeed. The trouble is in the fighting of fire with fire

Is there an alternative way?

Here is a classic example....

It's one thing to have our own indigenous pedos, who mainly operate on their own or in small groups

You naive, ignorant silly little man. Bless.
http://ukpaedos-exposed.com/jimmy-s...ren-were-loaned-to-rich-paedophile-yachtsmen/
I know the story is historic, but if you think that indigenous white peados are without a large clever infrastructure of child abuse then you must be a complete idiot. And if you think it is not going on today then you are dumber than I thought. Difficult to believe I know.

Guess what Whitespittles' response was.........


Deafening eh?

I also asked (the coward) JBR for clarity on a few things and he avoided it with a pitifully lilly livered response.

 

[DeletedUser]

latin=liber 'free'

latin = tardus 'slow'

 

[EFLImpudence]

I'd like to know what an apologist is?

It is a word only used as an insult to those who defend controversial subjects.

Ok then fair enough.
I defend or apologise for no one.

You asked what the word meant and I told you.

That someone wrongly calls you an apologist does not alter its meaning.

 

[noseall]

That someone wrongly calls you an apologist does not alter its meaning.

Did anyone say that it did?
Or do just like typing the obvious?

 

[Dextraneous]

I'm only here to restore parity and show what a lop-sided and blinkered view the racists have.

Laudable intentions indeed. The trouble is in the fighting of fire with fire

Is there an alternative way?

Shower them with love and kindness

 

[Dextraneous]

I'm only here to restore parity and show what a lop-sided and blinkered view the racists have.

Laudable intentions indeed. The trouble is in the fighting of fire with fire

Occasionally necessary and when it is, it's very effective, e.g. fire breaks to prevent further conflagration of forest fires.

Are you sure?? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firebreak

 

[Whitespirit66]

I'm only here to restore parity and show what a lop-sided and blinkered view the racists have.

Laudable intentions indeed. The trouble is in the fighting of fire with fire

Is there an alternative way?

Here is a classic example....

It's one thing to have our own indigenous pedos, who mainly operate on their own or in small groups

You naive, ignorant silly little man. Bless.
http://ukpaedos-exposed.com/jimmy-s...ren-were-loaned-to-rich-paedophile-yachtsmen/
I know the story is historic, but if you think that indigenous white peados are without a large clever infrastructure of child abuse then you must be a complete idiot. And if you think it is not going on today then you are dumber than I thought. Difficult to believe I know.

Guess what Whitespittles' response was.........


Deafening eh?

I also asked (the coward) JBR for clarity on a few things and he avoided it with a pitifully lilly livered response.

I didn't bother acknowledging your pathetic, abusive post since you have lowered yourself to trawl sensationalist, witch hunting sites that make the Daily Mail look like a paragon of virtue. Your post is laced with the usual insults in a vain attempt to boost your non-argument.

Difference is, one religious group stands out in the paedo stats, and one racial group appears to be their main target. Today's authorities are tackling the Savile era crimes, but ignoring the ROP culprits. Funny that. The authorities must be full of people like you who want to cover up the disaster that is multi culturalism.

 

[RNReindeer]

I'm only here to restore parity and show what a lop-sided and blinkered view the racists have.

Laudable intentions indeed. The trouble is in the fighting of fire with fire

Occasionally necessary and when it is, it's very effective, e.g. fire breaks to prevent further conflagration of forest fires.

Are you sure?? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Firebreak

Sorry, Dex, obviously, I meant controlled burns/back burns.