No, I was also referring to diversity relating to just the circuit supplying the heater and shower.Ah OK. You are referring to diversity relating to the incoming supply, I was referring to just the circuit supplying the shower.
Kind Regards, John

No, I was also referring to diversity relating to just the circuit supplying the heater and shower.Ah OK. You are referring to diversity relating to the incoming supply, I was referring to just the circuit supplying the shower.
Wouldn't the 32A MCB be very near tripping in the 20 minutes?If one had, say, a 20-minute shower (longer than most), with the heater on just for those 20 minutes, if one assumes that the total current of both was 48A, then the the average current over any 30-minute period would be (at most) 32A, and the average current over any 60-minute period would be (at most) 16A.
If it were a 32A MCB that would probably be the case. However, as I understand it, it's currently 40A, with suggestions that it may be upgraded to 45A.Wouldn't the 32A MCB be very near tripping in the 20 minutes?
Indeed - which is why I 'asked the question' and invited discussion, rather than 'asserting' anything.I wasn't sure if diversity would apply in this instance, and as I understand it is not always an exact science, sometimes relying on judgement calls.
A 50A MCB or RCBO would obviously make a 48A load both safe and compliant. Whether or not a 40A or 45A device would be compliant depends upon the above judgement in relation to diversity. However, even without diversity, I personally don't think there would be any significant safety issue, even if it were technically non-compliant. A 45A device should never trip - it is required to carry 50.85A (45A x 1.13) indefinitely, and 65.25A (45A x 1.45) for up to one hour. Even a 40A one is required to carry 45.2A indefinitely and 58A for up to one hour - so, again, would almost certainly never trip. However, it is technically wrong, and maybe would shorten the life of the MCB/RCBO, to subject a device to a current in excess of its rating - but, of course, one would not really be doing that if one believed that application of diversity was valid.I think my dad would be happiest knowing it is both safe and compliant first and foremost, followed by what would be easiest to install. Cost is not so much an issue.
If I understand the question correctly, the simplest solution would be to use an RCD FCU.What is the easiest option for adding RCD protection, if it were to be spurred off the sockets circuit?
It's very probable that those powers (hence the 11,500W) relate to 240V (they do that seemingly to make their products sound more powerful), but if, as is the convention, one works out the current at 230V, that would equate to a current of only about 45.9A (and a 'true' power, at 230V, of about 10,562W).I suppose if using 230V for the maths then 11500W/230V=50A, so a 45A breaker wouldn't trip.
As I've implied, I do not personally think that the cable would significantly overheat, even if the installation method of the cable is less than ideal. However, opinions may vary, particularly as regards what is strictly 'compliant'.Upgrading the breaker to 45A or 50A would be the easiest option if he wants to keep the loft sockets, if it can be ascertained that the 10mm cable would not overheat. Then run the heater from the shower radial in the loft.
You previously implied that there is just one socket in the loft (which is actually all that would be allowed on an unfused spur), but you now talk of 'sockets'. You don't necessarily need to find the source of the spur. If there is just one loft socket, you could just put an RCD FCU upstream ('in front') of it (in the loft, maybe close to the socket). If there are more than two sockets, then there really ought to be an FCU upstream of them, anyway, so you could add that (upstream of the first socket, in the loft). Either way, of course, you would be limited by the FCU to a total of 13A for the loft socket(s) plus the new heater.If it would not be possible, then the less easy option for keeping the loft sockets would be to locate where the spur is taken from on the 1st floor, and change it to an FCU spur. Then run the heater from the sockets spur in the loft, incorporating a RCD FCU. ...
OK, so if 13A were enough for the heater plus that double socket (really depends on what that socket is likely to be used for), then you could just put an RCD FCU just upstream of the socket in the loft. However, I personally think that you 'Plan A' (with a 45A or 50A RCBO) would be OK - but, as I've said, others may not be so keen!Sorry I'm on the phone at the moment but there is one socket outlet in the loft (the plural reference was because it is a double socket). My bad.
That would be fine if he were happy to plug the heater directly (or via an extension lead) into a socket in the loft or ('nasty') run some 'fixed wiring' from a plug plugged into the socket to a socket for the heater - but I suspect (may be wrong!) that none of those options would be convenient/acceptable.Change the socket in the loft to a twin RCD socket and plug it into that.
to a single socket for the heater.
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local