When considering in or out:

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
:rolleyes: Noseall has not got a scooby doo about most things ? let alone the complicated subject of the EU or Brexit.

He will always hunt with the fox & run with the hounds ;):)

Or is it the other way around hunt with the hounds & run with the fox ???????? :)

well what ever :):)
 
Do you think all who voted out are ignorant *******?
No not all.

But those who think that we can quickly strike trade deals with other countries? Yes.
Those who think that large ones like the USA and China won't shaft us? Yes.
Those who think that a lower value of the £ won't cause fuel bills, food prices, and pretty much all manufactured items, to increase in price? Yes.
Those who think that an economic hit won't reduce the tax revenues and therefore won't lead to even more austerity cuts? Yes.
Those who think that unelected Brussels bureaucrats are forcing the UK to bend to imposed laws? Yes.
Those who think that the European Convention on Human Rights will no longer apply, and the European Court of Human Rights will no longer have jurisdiction? Yes.
Those who think that we can remain in the customs union, and the single market, so that (for example) the half a million cars we export to the EU won't have a 10% tariff imposed on them, without having to pay into the EU budget and accept freedom of movement? Yes.
Those who think that it was because of our EU membership that 277,000 people from outside the EU migrated here in 2015? Yes.
Those who think that economic hardship, lower growth, and more pain for already benighted areas is a price worth paying for "sovereignty" and "control of our borders"? Yes.
Those who voted to leave as a joke, or to raise 2 fingers to the government? Yes
Those who, when looking at a question on the ballot paper about whether the UK should remain a member of the EU, instead answered the question "Are you happy with the economic imbalance created by successive governments over the past decades?". Yes.
 
Sponsored Links
I would make the effort to correct your ignorance but you would only argue,
Of course I would, because you would be wrong, driven by your prejudices and xenophobia.


your typing would get larger
It might - after all, what sort of people are big print books sometimes aimed at?


The main reason for my not bothering with your tedious and erronious assertions are simple
They are indeed.

But they are not the ones you pretend they are.
 
No not all.

But those who think that we can quickly strike trade deals with other countries? Yes.
Those who think that large ones like the USA and China won't shaft us? Yes.
Those who think that a lower value of the £ won't cause fuel bills, food prices, and pretty much all manufactured items, to increase in price? Yes.
Those who think that an economic hit won't reduce the tax revenues and therefore won't lead to even more austerity cuts? Yes.
Those who think that unelected Brussels bureaucrats are forcing the UK to bend to imposed laws? Yes.
Those who think that the European Convention on Human Rights will no longer apply, and the European Court of Human Rights will no longer have jurisdiction? Yes.
Those who think that we can remain in the customs union, and the single market, so that (for example) the half a million cars we export to the EU won't have a 10% tariff imposed on them, without having to pay into the EU budget and accept freedom of movement? Yes.
Those who think that it was because of our EU membership that 277,000 people from outside the EU migrated here in 2015? Yes.
Those who think that economic hardship, lower growth, and more pain for already benighted areas is a price worth paying for "sovereignty" and "control of our borders"? Yes.
Those who voted to leave as a joke, or to raise 2 fingers to the government? Yes
Those who, when looking at a question on the ballot paper about whether the UK should remain a member of the EU, instead answered the question "Are you happy with the economic imbalance created by successive governments over the past decades?". Yes.
I think that we can see how a person such as you would be bitter
 
And yet you claim to know what the people want from Brexit and that they will be dissappointed yet you have no clue about just one person.
Incredible isn't it!

Yes, most of the RWR that wanted out thought that they could gain better control of immigration. They perhaps didn't realise what they would have to sacrifice for that either. They are a funny bunch the RWR. An enigma. A paradox.
 
Of course I would, because you would be wrong, driven by your prejudices and xenophobia.



It might - after all, what sort of people are big print books sometimes aimed at?



They are indeed.

But they are not the ones you pretend they are.
If you say so sweetie..
 
Incredible isn't it!

Yes, most of the RWR that wanted out thought that they could gain better control of immigration. They perhaps didn't realise what they would have to sacrifice for that either. They are a funny bunch the RWR. An enigma. A paradox.
And yet we don't know what will happen as it hasn't happened yet. Have you been given the power to see into the future by gazing into the media?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
Back
Top