You said he was 'ridiculously orange' instead of too orange.
Did he? I didn't see that written.
You said he was 'ridiculously orange' instead of too orange.
That bloke is typical of someone who doesn't have an 'off' switch.
You will see the same personality amongst those who like to look ridiculously orange instead of nicely tanned.
You will see the same personality amongst those who wish to be 20st gorillas instead of just toned.
Did he? I didn't see that written.
You will see the same personality amongst those who like to look ridiculously orange instead of nicely tanned.
.
A bad person? No, your heart is in the right place.What makes you think I'm reluctant to do this? If I encourage the people I love to not look ridiculous, am I being a bad person?
Am not sure what point you are trying to make? I used a 'He'. It's a mistake, it's irrelevant. Nitpicking?"You said he was 'ridiculously orange' instead of too orange."
Read more: https://www.diynot.com/diy/threads/fashion.483258/page-3#ixzz4ieTarnHr
Nosey didn't.
When I arrived home with a mohawk .....
Thanks - I loved it.Cooooool!!!!
Am not sure what point you are trying to make? I used a 'He'. It's a mistake, it's irrelevant. Nitpicking?
Fair enough.Because it's hard enough trying to sensibly discuss what was said on here, let alone discuss what wasn't![]()
Fair enough.
But as you'd already figured out it was a mistake from the off, did it really need 3 posts about it?
![]()
Grins.I didn't, but you seemed pretty insistent that you were correct in what you'd said
And no offence or nit-picking intended![]()
the importance was the choice of word that Noseall chose. 'Ridiculous' which by it's very origin means to ridicule