Asbestos testing

No. Depends on the context but generally the legislation requires assumption that any suspect materials contain asbestos in the absence of a test.
 
That is saying "if there's any doubt, then there is no doubt". i.e unless you can PROVE there is none, you have to ASSUME there is.

Nozzle
 
So, a look around the place can determine that. Such as old Victorian buildings will have none with only additions suspect. That is an informed valued decision. Yes?
 
So, a look around the place can determine that. Such as old Victorian buildings will have none with only additions suspect. That is an informed valued decision. Yes?

What is the context for the "look around the place"?
 
So, a look around the place can determine that. Such as old Victorian buildings will have none with only additions suspect. That is an informed valued decision. Yes?

No you cannot just say because it is a Victorian building it will not contain asbestos, it would be extremely unlikely for everything in the building to be original. What about the floorcoverings, wall and ceiling finishes, any replacement services etc. etc.
 
The valued decision is looking at improvements since built and assessing.
 
A valued decision is looking at the improvements since built (Victorian buildings had no asbestos in them) and assessing.
 
I think we're missing a lot of context here.

To answer your original question, asbestos testing certainly isn't mandatory, many people go through their whole lives without being tested.
 

If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below, or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.

Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.


Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local

 
Back
Top