Momentum the new neo fascists

I see you are logged in, but would rather not answer your accusations on another thread.
Just in case you missed it.....
To which I said.....
Where are these posts Doggit?
Doggit frequently makes unsupportable allegations, he refuses to acknowledge the criticism, refuses to acknowledge that he is mistaken, or to apologise for his mistake.
upload_2018-2-14_9-37-17.png

upload_2018-2-14_9-38-46.png


Either he enjoys making incorrect allegations, or his memory is failing.
Come to think of it, he often claims that his Aspergers gives him special unemotional insight. :rolleyes:
Is he doing an A**e end and claiming some disability to try to give himself an advantage? :rolleyes:
I think it causes him "restricted and repetitive patterns of behavior and interests" like making unsupportable allegations.

It is what he does.
 
Last edited:
No, America doesn't crush socialist countries, but it does tend to end up in conflict with communist countries.
 
No, America doesn't crush socialist countries, but it does tend to end up in conflict with communist countries.
Of course it crushes them, one way or another they remove them, here you better get reading Doggit...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_involvement_in_regime_change
United States involvement in regime change has entailed both overt and covert actions aimed at altering, replacing, or preserving foreign governments. In the latter half of the 19th century, the US government undertook regime change actions mainly in Latin America and the southwest Pacific, and included the Mexican-American, Spanish-American and Philippine-American wars. At the onset of the 20th century the United States shaped or installed friendly governments in many countries including Panama, Honduras, Nicaragua, Mexico, Haiti, and the Dominican Republic.
 
You're great at picking up quotes Banjo, but that list just shows the counties they gone up against, not why they did it. Some of then I know where communist countries, and others were just conflicts. Mexico arrested the sailors, and have always had disagreements with America, but they weren't a socialist country.
 
You're great at picking up quotes Banjo, but that list just shows the counties they gone up against, not why they did it. Some of then I know where communist countries, and others were just conflicts. Mexico arrested the sailors, and have always had disagreements with America, but they weren't a socialist country.
But my point still stands, America has crushed most socialist countries, mainly the South American ones near them, socialism never really gets a fair chance
 
No, your point is wrong Banjo. America has a ridiculous notion of trying to crush communist countries, it always has done, but it doesn't bother with socialist countries, and as I pointed out, many of those countries were dispute and conflicts, not ideological regime changes. So, are you really using a socialism as a cover for communism.

Socialism is a great idea, but as it often tend to drag the upper groups down to the lowest level, it never works properly. You have to make money to be able to help those that need support, but socialism tends to discourage money making by taxing the rich, and so discourages wealth creation.
 
No, your point is wrong Banjo. America has a ridiculous notion of trying to crush communist countries, it always has done, but it doesn't bother with socialist countries, and as I pointed out, many of those countries were dispute and conflicts, not ideological regime changes. So, are you really using a socialism as a cover for communism.

Socialism is a great idea, but as it often tend to drag the upper groups down to the lowest level, it never works properly. You have to make money to be able to help those that need support, but socialism tends to discourage money making by taxing the rich, and so discourages wealth creation.
what about venezuela, do you regard that as communist or socialist? i regard it as a socialist state
 
Socialism cant work with interaction with other countries. So any countries that trade (ie all countries) stop it working.
I would ask you to explain your model.
But you will probably think I am picking on you. I am not.
I know from experience that you talk total nonsense. So I do not expect a sensible discussion.
Therefore, I am not going to ask you to explain your model. I do not want a nonsensical exchange of verbal meandering.
 
Venezuela refers to itself as a socialist state, but as it follows the tenents of Castro, it is regarded as more of a communist state, so that pretty much implies that you are some what of a communist, describing yourself as a more socially acceptable socialist
 
Venezuela refers to itself as a socialist state, but as it follows the tenents of Castro, it is regarded as more of a communist state, so that pretty much implies that you are some what of a communist, describing yourself as a more socially acceptable socialist
Is this another of your "it is reckoned" but you were unable to say "who reckons"!
 
Is this another of your "it is reckoned" but you were unable to say "who reckons"!

Venezuala isnt communist, but it is often considered to be. There is plenty of editorial content online that discusses Venezuala as communist.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/kenrap...ks-set-to-be-choosing-communism/#5c26aaaf5cd5
https://www.reddit.com/r/changemyvi...v_venezuela_is_not_a_socialist_country_but_a/

Corbyn loves it! An example of his idea of utopia
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/201...cialist-induced-chaos-yet-remains-corbynista/
 
Back
Top