And "normal" at 50 is different to normal at "75"
And "normal" with COPD is different to "normal" without it.
And "normal" at 50 is different to normal at "75"
complete and utter rubbish stop taking what I said out of context just to point score."possible"...."quite a normal life"....
Non-committal, meaningless, and rubbish.
Unless "quite a normal life" means "not doing much really, because even the act of breathing gets you out of breath"...
its considerably better than being dead you dumb tw@tAnd "normal" with COPD is different to "normal" without it.
its considerably better than being dead you dumb tw@t
you are the one that is wrong.When the argument's lost.......
you are the one that is wrong.
shame you aren't man enough to admit it
stop taking what I said out of context.OK, answer me this.
If any of these people did not have any symptoms, and had no reduction in the quality of their lives, why did they feel the need to seek medical opinion (ultimately leading to a diagnosis of COPD)?
yes, I knowAlso,
Chronic - persistent, of ongoing nature. Contrast with "acute"
Obstructive - causing obstruction (of normal function)
Pulmonary - of the lungs
Disease - self-explanatory
It's all there, in the name.
When the virus was spreading around China and South Korea there was much footage on the news of local authorities spraying and washing the streets, we don't seem to be doing any of that here? it did seem pointless to me, but then again they seem to have got in under control.
Because the 2m rule is a debunked myth, better than nothing, but easy for people to visualise.Also I see this morning there is talk that the public using masks may help reduce the spread.