FGM

I used to know a bloke who had to have a circumcision after an 'accident'. He said for the first few months it used to chafe against his underwear and as a result he lost all sensitivity around the end.
 
My nephew had to go to hospital to have his manhood disentagled from his trousers fly :lol: even the doctor laughed (how unprofessional :lol:)
 

That's the process by which it's been done, which of course is terrible, I'm not convinced the procedure even done under sterile medical conditions offers any benefit. If it's not necessary, why's it there? I don't see babies appendices being whipped out at birth?
 
In certain jewish sects the Rabbi will suck out the blood after performing the circumcision.
 
There aren't many Jews in the world and Muslims do the same - as do the royal family.

If, as was stated earlier, a vast majority in the US also do it, then wherever did the stupid practice begin?


Wearing silly hats and hairstyles is one thing but religious demands to mutilate the body should raise some suspicions.
 
You may wish to investigate who co-authored that study, who peer reviewed it and the critism of said study.

"The paper also finds that over their lifetime, half of all uncircumcised males will contract a medical condition related to their foreskin"
What a load of tosh.
 
Back
Top