What a lot of boll@x!
What is?What a lot of boll@x!
Why? I fail to see the difference between 'coloured' and 'of colour'.
Because you're only looking at the words.
As said before, context and intent are everything.
There is still mostly nothing wrong with the word "coloured", in itself. But, because segregation era signage and people used it to identify the discriminated against, it does have negative meaning.
Like "gammon" being used as an insult. The insult is the specific definition at the time, the context, and the intent.
That's fine call me a 'person of gammon' and i won't feel offended?!
If you (or anyone else) is hell-bent on feeling offended, I dare say you or they will be able to find your / their reason or excuse to.
It's just the way of the world.
So you chose to ignore the history of 'coloured" and want to lump it in with all words used in that era? What - any word, even if it had no meaning? Ok....Why? I fail to see the difference between 'coloured' and 'of colour'.
Football has moved on so much. To say it hasn't moved on is just mindless. Ive seen tens of bananas chucked at Manchester Citys first Black keeper. Monkey chants drowning grounds.
A racist Chelsea fan was asked why he was shouting racist insults at the opposing team when Chelsea have a lot of black players. His response? "Well, they're ours".
I heard that quote too ; it was from the eighties. Might have even been the seventies.
To use it to try and justify your position that things are barely better nowadays is ridiculous.
So you think it's ok that monkey chants have been made throughout the last decade because you think one fan made a stupid statement in the 70's?