I have always had a lingering distrust of the man- possibly unfair- but can't shake it off. I suspect him of disloyalty to the UK: as if it were a flag of convenience.
Statute of limitations...?
I'm wondering if this has already been looked into and the woman has no case to answer as such? What I mean is, although Mo is saying he was essentially forced into x years of servitude, it could be a difficult thing to prove this far down the line. The family that took him in could simply deny it, alluding to the fact they allowed him to start school etc when he was 12. They could say he was well cared for, how easy is it to prove otherwise? Especially if the whole family that took him in sings off the same hymn sheet.
Something not right on the BBC? You don't say!
Assuming you mean more broadly rather than the scope of the limitation act which would not apply to criminal law. Of course you’d know that being an expert.
By your argument Mo Farah is an illegal immigrant who only came here to live off benefits.Blimey, what a shocker! Poor lad, how terrible it must have been for him.
Sir Mo Farah reveals he was trafficked to the UK as a child
The Olympic star says the name Mohamed Farah was given to him by a stranger who flew him to the UK.www.bbc.co.uk
