1980’s again

[Deleted member 221031]

No they didn't.

View attachment 306896

Nuclear Power in Sweden - World Nuclear Association

Sweden's nuclear power reactors provide about 30% of its electricity. In November 2023 the government announced plans to construct two large-scale reactors by 2035 and the equivalent of 10 new reactors, including small modular reactors, by 2045.

world-nuclear.org

• In 1980, the government decided to phase out nuclear power. In June 2010, Parliament voted to repeal this policy.
• The country's 1997 energy policy allowed 10 reactors to operate longer than envisaged by the 1980 phase-out policy, but also resulted in the premature closure of a two-unit plant (1200 MWe). Some 1600 MWe was subsequently added in uprates to the remaining ten reactors.
• In 2015 decisions were made to close four older reactors by 2020, removing 2.8 GWe net.

What does it say in the first line ? That’s from your post.

You’re getting very good at proving me right. Thank you.

 

[Deleted member 221031]

Nuclear power is good for the planet compared with other energy sources.

If you’re not bothered about all the waste ? Yeah let’s ignore that……

 

[denso13]

What does it say in the first line ?

It doesn't say what you claimed. Nuclear output went up after 1980, not down. They decided to phase it out some time in the future, it didn't start in 1980.

 

[Deleted member 221031]

It doesn't say what you claimed. Nuclear output went up after 1980, not down. They decided to phase it out some time in the future, it didn't start in 1980.

The government decided to phase out nuclear power in 1980.

Case closed.

 

[denso13]

The government decided to phase out nuclear power in 1980.

That's better.

 

[Deleted member 221031]

That's better.

That’s what I said all long. You’d make a good woman.

 

[Deleted member 221031]

And what about all the extra waste ? Maybe the uk can handle it for them? Unless Brexit gets it’s the way.

 

[denso13]

And what about all the extra waste ?

Plenty of solutions for nuclear waste. What do you think the issue is?

 

[noseall]

Funny

How so?

 

[noseall]

It doesn't say what you claimed. Nuclear output went up after 1980, not down. They decided to phase it out some time in the future, it didn't start in 1980.

Stop feeding the troll.

 

[Deleted member 221031]

Stop feeding the troll.

It’s a genuine post.

Sweden even though they have a lot better chance of making renewables work given the size of Sweden, population and all the resources, still chose nuclear energy.

Germany seem to be moving away from it.

It’s a dangerous energy source and there’s no permanent storage for the waste. But yeah keep arguing like the little brats you are lol.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

It’s a genuine post.

Sweden even though they have a lot better chance of making renewables work given the size of Sweden, population and all the resources, still chose nuclear energy.

Germany seem to be moving away from it.

It’s a dangerous energy source and there’s no permanent storage for the waste. But yeah keep arguing like the little brats you are lol.

Irony

 

[denso13]

there’s no permanent storage for the waste

Yes there is.

 

[Deleted member 221031]

Yes there is.

Where

Finland soon home to world's first permanent nuclear waste site

After two decades of excavating, Finland's Onkalo site is almost ready to safely contain nuclear waste for thousands of years.

yle.fi

Seems you’re wrong again.

 

[denso13]

Stop feeding the troll.

Sorry, must try harder.