failing to understand the rules... again.
- Thread starter motorbiking
- Start date
- Joined
- 10 Jul 2024
- Messages
- 2,570
- Reaction score
- 88
- Country
Who is Sunak?
A dishonest lying scumbag who's not quite as unpopular as kierWho is Sunak?
He has spread doom and Gloom with every utterance, running the country down.
A real Leader, would have bounded in, shown vision, raised morale, and produced a forward thinking plan.
Labour are showing they are not sure what to do, now they are in power.
It's about the timing of the declaration, the match had started before the football was identified.It only became a political football after the election.
No he has pointed out some things need fixing. Looks to be long term economics. Tough decisions. A fact. Insufficient money coming in for everything to be perfect so decisions need to be made. The budget will provide info on that aspect. Reeves speaks tomorrow. All she may do is explain why.
Some are already saying she is talking rubbish in one particular area however the IFS did think borrow your way out and then promptly dismissed the idea as soon as full figures were available.
- Joined
- 10 Jul 2024
- Messages
- 2,570
- Reaction score
- 88
- Country
Advice was being sought, and when that advice was received the correct declarations were made.
The issue about the match having started simply illustrates how nothing happens immediately. Things take time.
And when the anti-Starmer brigade got hold of it, they turned an innocent issue into a political football.
- Joined
- 10 Jul 2024
- Messages
- 2,570
- Reaction score
- 88
- Country
How has the Peer, Lord Alli, benefited by his generosity?
How has he gained influence, when he was already a Labour Peer?
To allow him to organise a donor party. He also helps with finding donors.
He said the delay was due to his staff seeking advice on what was declarable, which is plausible but I don't personally buy it. He lectures the Commons on the law, was a lawyer, 28 days is plenty of time and the facts and rules are clear. I suspect he was buying time to avoid political embarrassment. I'm not bothered about kieth having a personal donor, as long as there is no suggestion of undue influence. On the other hand how does politics works without money?Advice was being sought, and when that advice was received the correct declarations were made.
The issue about the match having started simply illustrates how nothing happens immediately. Things take time.
And when the anti-Starmer brigade got hold of it, they turned an innocent issue into a political football.
- Joined
- 10 Jul 2024
- Messages
- 2,570
- Reaction score
- 88
- Country
Your allowed to disbelieve.
They're pretty complicated and nothing to do with law.
You're allowed to suspect.
How can a current Labour Peer gain any additional influence?
Some comments are a bit weird. Seem to forget that the donations were all declared.
In Rayner's case she probably gave the reason for her decision in the clip. It may turn out that according to the rules and what these are actually applied to are entirely correct - not her personal holiday. Gov business yes but that was not what she was on.
It's all just mud slinging.
www.theguardian.com
In Rayner's case she probably gave the reason for her decision in the clip. It may turn out that according to the rules and what these are actually applied to are entirely correct - not her personal holiday. Gov business yes but that was not what she was on.
It's all just mud slinging.
Boris Johnson cleared over Mustique holiday but criticised for explanation
Commons standards committee’s findings underline haphazard nature of PM’s financial arrangements
www.theguardian.com
He's making Truss' honeymoon period look like a long and glorious one.
