- Joined
- 7 Nov 2023
- Messages
- 13,290
- Reaction score
- 7,816
- Country

Apology accepted.I didn't intend for the question to be complicated. My apologies. However...
![]()

Apology accepted.I didn't intend for the question to be complicated. My apologies. However...
![]()
Not 100%, the US was a partner, and after WW2 had an interest in maintaining a peaceful Europe. The logical extension of Bannon's argument is that Amreica should not have have become our ally in WW2 and left Germany to conquer us. The Bannon agenda is effectively a Pootin serving agenda.I agree it is most disturbing considering our special relationship that we once held, Trump was always going to destroy this and is no surprise at his stance. However if we step up our military spending rather than cutting it as we have been doing then this is a good thing. We have 100% relied upon the U.S as far as NATO goes.
A disturbing video to watch. He is taking the alt right line which is that Russsia isn't a threat to American interests so sod everybody else. Don't forget we're British not American. Same language different politics.

Spasibo, tovarishch!Educate yourself on the subject then

I was talking about the fact that we thought the U.S can spend on NATO but not us. It is like going out for a meal with another couple and splitting the bill 50/50 then giving them only 20 because you think they can afford it more than yourself. How many times would that couple invite you out?Not 100%, the US was a partner, and after WW2 had an interest in maintaining a peaceful Europe. The logical extension of Bannon's argument is that Amreica should not have have become our ally in WW2 and left Germany to conquer us. The Bannon agenda is effectively a Pootin serving agenda.

Why would you consider that to be an appropriate answer?Spasibo, tovarishch!
If you think split bill is the answer to a geo political problem we are all genuinely f***edI was talking about the fact that we thought the U.S can spend on NATO but not us. It is like going out for a meal with another couple and splitting the bill 50/50 then giving them only 20 because you think they can afford it more than yourself. How many times would that couple invite you out?


Why is it inappropriate?Why would you consider that to be an appropriate answer?

You have not answered to his suggestion of you learning before speaking.Why is it inappropriate?
Pootin and Trumpf are ****ing in the soup and asking Zellenski to leave a five star review on trip adviserI was talking about the fact that we thought the U.S can spend on NATO but not us. It is like going out for a meal with another couple and splitting the bill 50/50 then giving them only 20 because you think they can afford it more than yourself. How many times would that couple invite you out?

Do you consider it clever by using Google translate to reply to someone who speaks English? Could you not reply in English which is your language?Spasibo, tovarishch!
Do you consider it clever by using Google translate to reply to someone who speaks English? Could you not reply in English which is your language?

I knowThis really seems to have wound you up
It wasn't even your post he replied to.

Heaven forbid!You have not answered to his suggestion of you learning before speaking.