- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 22,872
- Reaction score
- 3,062
- Country

It's what the court thinks that's important. Here's a clue, 2006.So you think that mothers should be separated from their children then?

It's what the court thinks that's important. Here's a clue, 2006.So you think that mothers should be separated from their children then?
the mother obviously over ruled him i wonder whySays the Trump regime.
No it wasn't, as an American citizen her father was there for her.

Thanks. Here’s another date for you. 1993It's what the court thinks that's important. Here's a clue, 2006.

"Trump scores poorly on economy and immigration as some fear he is ‘exceeding powers’ and focussed on wrong issues"put the poll up on his handling of immigration which the thread is about

You don't know that. Neither does the Court.the mother obviously over ruled him i wonder why

2011 proves you wrong.Thanks. Here’s another date for you. 1993
those on the ground that allowed it do and there is proof even the court has admitted that by asking to see itYou don't know that. Neither does the Court.

They shouldn't have.those on the ground that allowed it
Why have the Court arranged another hearing?there is proof even the court has admitted that by asking to see it
why shouldnt they have ?They shouldn't have.
Why have the Court arranged another hearing?

They want to check that due process was followed as they have their doubts. It's really quite simple.eh? what bit of they want to see the letter have you missed ?
yep really simple they want to see the letter from the motherThey want to check that due process was followed as they have their doubts. It's really quite simple.

What letter? Where did the court say that?yep really simple they want to see the letter from the mother
what letter ! have you not read the whole story ?What letter? Where did the court say that?
Lawyers for the government said that the child’s mother has legal custody of the child and that she indicated in a letter she would take her daughter to Honduras.What letter? Where did the court say that?