- Joined
- 25 Apr 2023
- Messages
- 9,327
- Reaction score
- 6,401
- Country
I haven't got a problem, thanks for your concern.
UFO / UAP
- Thread starter Koolpc
- Start date
- Status
- Joined
- 25 Apr 2023
- Messages
- 9,327
- Reaction score
- 6,401
- Country
Well now you mention it when Notch posts a list of all our names with some insult, how come you dont tell him he has a problem?
Politeness, or to be taken seriously. As it is you just sound like a crank.
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 22,984
- Reaction score
- 3,069
- Country
It's like flat earthers, hollow moon proponents or lizard people who rule the earth, they claim to have enough evidence to convince them. But no right minded person would give their ideas the time of day.
But as @pete01 says, you can't prove them wrong, so who knows.
Because he is directing his posts towards specific individuals, backed up with specific accusations.
You have no idea who are my "mates" on here, or if I have any.
- Joined
- 11 Dec 2012
- Messages
- 4,496
- Reaction score
- 2,226
- Country
Mainstream Archeology doesnt have all the answers when it comes to the pyramids / Ancient Egyptology....
A lot of it is guesswork. There are many objects that they still dont know how they were actually made! They can only guess....
Much like the 'Sabu disk'.....an extremely thin object made out of schist stone which is very fragile......even today, nobody could 'carve' that from that stone!!!
Also stone vases that are minutely symmetrical and believed to have been turned on some type of ancient lathe!
And of course the pyramids themselves!! Some believe these werent tombs. Why? Because in ancient Egyptian times, all tombs were decorated with paintings and hieroglyphics. The pyramids have none!
So, lots to delve into. Its not as simple as to just go along with Egyptian archeologists interpretations. Too many holes in the bucket to do so!
A lot of it is guesswork. There are many objects that they still dont know how they were actually made! They can only guess....
Much like the 'Sabu disk'.....an extremely thin object made out of schist stone which is very fragile......even today, nobody could 'carve' that from that stone!!!
Also stone vases that are minutely symmetrical and believed to have been turned on some type of ancient lathe!
And of course the pyramids themselves!! Some believe these werent tombs. Why? Because in ancient Egyptian times, all tombs were decorated with paintings and hieroglyphics. The pyramids have none!
So, lots to delve into. Its not as simple as to just go along with Egyptian archeologists interpretations. Too many holes in the bucket to do so!
That you can't seem to find...?
That you can't seem to post up or link to....
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 22,984
- Reaction score
- 3,069
- Country
Correct, it was a long time ago.
Yes, a puzzler, but that in itself doesn't mean the Egyptians didn't do it.
And guess what. None of the archaeologists guess that aliens built the pyramids.
Any news (titter)?
- Joined
- 11 Dec 2012
- Messages
- 4,496
- Reaction score
- 2,226
- Country
Maybe but, with the 'known' tools that they used in those days they couldnt have made that disc. Mainstream archeology have said they only had copper / stone chisels. They didnt even have the wheel that far back!!
Its a total mystery...
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 22,984
- Reaction score
- 3,069
- Country
Didn't they?
1st wheel was invented 6,000 years ago in the Carpathian Mountains, modeling study suggests
It's possible that the wheel was invented by copper miners in the Carpathian Mountains up to 6,000 years ago, according to a modeling study that uses techniques from structural mechanics.
The Egyptians made loads of bowls out of schist.
It was also popular for various other nations, because it's easy to carve and strong enough to be fairly durable.
Schist & Gandharan Carved Stone Antiquities for Sale | Ancient & Oriental
Schist is a grey stone of a relatively high hardness that can be carved to some detail. Schist commonly contains varying amounts of mica and quartz which can lend it a subtle sparking quality. Schist was the major material of choice for the infamous Gandharan sculptures.
www.antiquities.co.uk
All this *******s about 'no one today could carve that' is just assumption and ignores thousands of tears of carved stone bowls.
- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 22,984
- Reaction score
- 3,069
- Country
Maybe not,
1. Advanced Techniques or Tools:
The disc may represent evidence of advanced techniques or tools that have not been preserved in the archaeological record. For instance, the use of harder materials like dolerite for carving or the application of abrasives such as quartz sand could have enabled finer detailing.
2. Lost Technologies:
It is also possible that the First Dynasty Egyptians employed techniques or technologies that were later lost to history. The disc could reflect a high level of technological experimentation, suggesting a sophisticated understanding of materials and mechanics.
3. Symbolic Significance Over Functionality:
The effort required to carve schist into such an intricate shape suggests the disc held great symbolic or ritual importance. If it was not intended for practical use, the material’s brittleness may have been less of a concern than its aesthetic or symbolic qualities.
4. Skilled Craftsmanship:
The artisans of early dynastic Egypt were highly skilled, as evidenced by the intricate jewelry, pottery, and tools from the same period. The Sabu Disc may represent the pinnacle of such craftsmanship, requiring both technical expertise and artistic vision.
- Joined
- 25 Apr 2023
- Messages
- 9,327
- Reaction score
- 6,401
- Country
- Status
