Reform did well. Again.

Status
Not open for further replies.
40,000 migrants in hotels

Yes exactly

Task force with a turbo charged mission :ROFLMAO:is needed
If the UK stops processing asylum seekers, and can't legally return them to France.
And if they don't process their asylum application, they can't legally repatriate them back to their origin.
What do you think happens to them? You can't just make them disappear.
 
40,000 migrants in hotels

Yes exactly

Task force with a turbo charged mission :ROFLMAO:is needed
Send them somewhere who will welcome them, Rwanda is a good option which nobody used. I would give them egg and chips and then straight on a plane to Rwanda for processing. I am sure they would be flocking over here then. Only ones that should be put into hotels in the UK are genuine family's fleeing from war torn countries, such as Ukraine, not from France.
 
Last edited:
Send them somewhere who will welcome them, Rwanda is a good option which nobody used. I would give them egg and chips and then straight on a plane to Rwanda for processing. I am sure they would be flocking over here then. Only ones that should be put into hotels in the UK are genuine family's fleeing from war torn countries, such as Ukraine, not from France.
Most of the Ukrainian refugees weren’t in Ukraine when they claimed asylum in the U.K.

So you are contradicting yourself
 
Send them somewhere who will welcome them, Rwanda is a good option which nobody used. I would give them egg and chips and then straight on a plane to Rwanda for processing.
The legality of doing that is in question.
Until the legality of anything is decided, it's foolhardy to implement the process.
How many asylum seekers were sent to Rwanda under the last government? And at what cost?
 
Most of the Ukrainian refugees weren’t in Ukraine when they claimed asylum in the U.K.

So you are contradicting yourself
Not at all, I said any genuine families regardless of where they arrive from should be given hotels to live in until they can safely return home. Nobody would have a problem with that. The single men arriving from France in boats should be processed in Rwanda.
 
468206093_10235850744592824_7210473658364385501_n.jpg
 
The single men arriving from France in boats should be processed in Rwanda.
The legality of doing that is in question.
Until the legality of anything is decided, it's foolhardy to implement the process.
How many asylum seekers were sent to Rwanda under the last government? And at what cost?
It isn't wise to break international law willy nilly. Apart from creating a poor perception of UK on the international stage, it can be time and resource wasteful.
 
Why Rwanda? No need to go that far.
It is already in place, the country has agreed to it and it has been paid for costing us money, it never got off the ground. Where do you suggest as an alternative?
 
It is already in place, the country has agreed to it and it has been paid for costing us money that it never got off the ground.
No, Rwanda wasn't about processing, people would be sent there, never to return, even if they were genuine refugees.

France offered to help with a processing centre there. The Tories turned the offer down.

There are no safe routes for people arriving by boat. If they want to come here, we force them to risk their lives in getting here.
 
No, Rwanda wasn't about processing, people would be sent there, never to return, even if they were genuine refugees.

France offered to help with a processing centre there. The Tories turned the offer down.

There are no safe routes for people arriving by boat. If they want to come here, we force them to risk their lives in getting here.
They would be allowed to stay in Rwanda and gain assylum, isn't that what they want?
 
Not under the Tory Rwanda scheme, they couldn't get to the UK from there.
But they are coming across the chanel by inflatables so arriving here ilegally with no visas or an invite, they then can be deported safely to Rwanda. Nobody is coming from Rwanda to here, it is the other way round.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top