Israel Accuses Europe Of Inciting US Shooting

[Deleted member 323070]

It's my method!

I'm looking for flaws in the plan. First, how to avoid anyone getting shot by mistake. Then, how to avoid drowning people.

To achieve what?

 

[MNW67]

To achieve what?

An understanding of whether it's possible to puncture the boat without a risk of killing someone.

 

[Deleted member 323070]

An understanding of whether it's possible to puncture the boat without a risk of killing someone.

Why would you want to puncture a boat in the middle of the Channel?
Don't you think that might be considered as reckless behaviour likely to endanger life, at the least?

 

[MNW67]

Why would you want to puncture a boat in the middle of the Channel?
Don't you think that might be considered as reckless behaviour likely to endanger life, at the least?

That was my gut feeling. But others have said it can be done without risk. Hence, why I have been discussing it.

 

[Deleted member 323070]

That was my gut feeling. But others have said it can be done without risk. Hence, why I have been discussing it.

You can't go around damaging other peoples' boats, by any method, when they're in the middle of the Channel,.
It's like discussing the ways of illegally evicting someone from their home.
It's pointless and could be considered as conspiracy to commit a crime.

 

[MNW67]

It's pointless and could be considered as conspiracy to commit a crime.

Don't report me to the police!

 

[Deleted member 323070]

Don't report me to the police!

I have no intention to, because I recognise the pointlessness of the discussion.

 

[securespark]

A giant poking device?

Indeed!

 

[MNW67]

Indeed!

Shouldn't it be the other way round

 

[Highway Man]

You can't go around damaging other peoples' boats, by any method, when they're in the middle of the Channel,.
It's like discussing the ways of illegally evicting someone from their home.
It's pointless and could be considered as conspiracy to commit a crime.

Of course you can, did you never hear of the cod wars where they would shoot and sink trawlers out of their waters.

 

[securespark]

Shouldn't it be the other way round

I see what you mean...

Ooooh, Matron!

 

[Deleted member 323070]

Of course you can, did you never hear of the cod wars where they would shoot and sink trawlers out of their waters.

And who won?

 

[Highway Man]

And who won?

Britain and Iceland went to war, to some degree. The Cod Wars were a series of disputes between Britain and Iceland which took place between the 1950s to the 1970s. The clash between the two nations was concerning the rights to fish in Icelandic waters. In answer to your question. Iceland won.

 

[Highway Man]

And who won?

https://www.iwm.org.uk/history/the-cod-wars-explained-the-conflict-between-iceland-and-britain#:~:text=In%20the%20mid%2D20th%20century,to%20fish%20in%20Icelandic%20waters.

 

[Deleted member 323070]

Britain and Iceland went to war, to some degree. The Cod Wars were a series of disputes between Britain and Iceland which took place between the 1950s to the 1970s. The clash between the two nations was concerning the rights to fish in Icelandic waters. In answer to your question. Iceland won.

It didn't end well for UK then?

And UK paid over £200 Million compensation to fishermen.
And the compensation is not ended yet.